Tires Pirelli or Kumho

Pirelli Tires
Dizzy_Piccolo3821
  • Noise:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 5.0

I decided to preference lower road noise benefit of this Pirelli tire. I have a 2021 CX-5 SIG. Already a quite vehicle while driving but now even more so. The ride is so smooth. Discount Tire only needed to install balancing weights on one of the wheels. Speaks to the quality of these tires. I replaced the original Toyo A36, at 30K miles. I am very happy with my choice.

Pros: lower road noise, smooth ride, good quality
Vehicle: Mazda
Mileage: 30000 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Pirelli Tires

I put a little over 50K on my Dunlops before replacing them a few weeks back and got Pirelli Scorpion AS/Plus 3. I do a lot of long-distance driving though, so maintaining range was important to me.

Pros: maintaining range
Mileage: 50000 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Pirelli Tires

I have the Scorpions and love them. I choose them because of the lower ride noise and think they look nicer on the car than the CC2s.

Pros: lower ride noise, nice appearance
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Pirelli Tires

I have those tires on for my replacement all seasons over the garbage Pirelli's. They handled the most recent snow admirably, but they still had minor slippage here and there.

Pros: handled snow admirably
Cons: minor slippage
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Pirelli Tires

Taca Michelin, n\u00e3o tem erro. Pirelli \u00e9 muito duro n\u00e3o passa confian\u00e7a na chuva, principalmente em rua de cal\u00e7amento

Pros: Michelin n\u00e3o tem erro
Cons: Pirelli muito duro
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Kumho Tires

I wore out a set of Kumho Ecsta 712's on my Miata in about 7.5K miles. Of course I was sliding the rears using the throttle to steer around curves on Highway 9 in California.

Cons: wore out quickly
Vehicle: Mazda
Mileage: 7500 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Kumho Tires
Threet3n
  • Grip:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 1.0

Tires (Kumho Ecsta LX Platinum) were installed 6/25/2024 @ 151,xxx miles (with receipts). Manufactured date is May 2023. Currently, car has 165,xxx miles. As you can see, the two front (now rotated to rear) tires are bald! The other two tires have a normal amount of tread remaining however. I was running about 1° of camber front and rear, and explains why the inside is more worn, but doesn't explain the overall accelerated wear that occurred only on the fronts. I also have an alignment report showing only the front left Toe is out of spec (-0.39° measured vs. +/-0.08 spec).

In my opinion, this would fall under the warranty via excessive/premature tire wear, but of course I imagine any shop would fuss about the lack of rotation. To make matters worse, I purchased and installed these tires at Walmart, which I'm now learning isn't an authorized Kumho installer and Kumho's warranty form says they must be installed by an authorized installer. However, Walmart's own listing for the tires says it's covered by a 50k mile tread life warranty (see last photo).

Cons: premature wear, bald tires
Mileage: 14000 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
1 ... 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 ... 139

Write your review

Help others - share your experience with this part.

Other comparisons
Loading...