Tires Nokia or Vredestein

Nokia Tires

I have used Nokian Hakka's of various types for years. I've been happy with every single set, although the all-seasons were not quite up to the standard of the dedicated snows.

Pros: happy with every set
Cons: all-seasons not up to standard
Vehicle: Subaru
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Nokia Tires
throwaway007676
  • Grip:
  • Noise:
Rating 5.0

I just took off a set of Nokians due to getting dry. They were rated for 50k miles, I had 85k on them and they still had 6-7/32 of tread left. Never a traction issue even in snow and ice, even in weather where I had no business being out there with a front wheel drive vehicle. So they checked all the boxes for me. Quiet with good traction, extra load on many models and a great overall tire.

Pros: quiet, good traction
Cons: getting dry
Mileage: 85000 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Vredestein Tires

Go with the Vredestein. It has consistently been rated excellent with no drawbacks, whereas the Pirelli has gotten criticized for subpar wet traction.

Pros: rated excellent
Cons: subpar wet traction
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Nokia Tires

Check out the Nokian Tyre One. It has Aramid sidewalls, low rolling resistance, and 80k mileage warranty.

Pros: Aramid sidewalls, low rolling resistance
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Nokia Tires

I’m getting Nokians. Brand new they were okay in the snow. Not good but okay. After 13k miles and a rotate the first snow was really sketchy.

Pros: okay when brand new
Cons: sketchy after 13k miles
Vehicle: Mazda
Mileage: 13000 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
1 ... 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 ... 101

Write your review

Help others - share your experience with this part.

Other comparisons
Loading...