Tires Nokia or Maxxis

Nokia Tires

Interesting review. I’ve been running my Nokian for over 13000 miles and I haven’t experienced what you have on the road. I’ve felt they are quite stable and handle super awesome compared to the stock AT Pirelli.

Pros: quite stable, handle awesome
Mileage: 13000 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Nokia Tires
j_mosk
  • Grip:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 5.0

I see extremely harsh winter conditions and run Sparco Terra 16x7 +35 (bronze) with 205/60r16 Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10 Studded on lifted 2023 BRZ 6MT. Wanted as much sidewall as possible for the types of roads I drive.

Pros: much sidewall
Vehicle: Toyota
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Nokia Tires

You should look at Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5 or Continental Viking Contact 7. I’ve used both on my Mini and I’ve used Nokians since I got my first Mini. Blizzak WS-90 are good.

Pros: good handling
Vehicle: MINI
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Maxxis Tires

The only thing I’d add is I’d suggest them in Maxxspeed, but they are only available in 2.35. Rode them front/rear last season and they were excellent.

Pros: they were excellent
Cons: only available in 2.35
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Maxxis Tires

I've been really impressed recently with the Conti tires (Cross Kings or Race Kings depending on how XC you want to go with it), specifically the ProTection versions with the Black Chili compound. Coming from Maxxis stuff I've been surprised by the amount of grip they have given how fast-rolling they are, at least for my local conditions (New England, so rocks, roots, more roots, a few roots, some roots, roots, rocks, roots, some more roots, a lot of roots, and roots.)

Pros: amount of grip
Cons: hard to find
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Nokia Tires
Jaymorz
  • Grip:
  • Noise:
Rating 4.0

I've had the Nokian WRG models for the past 10 years and there's always been a song and dance with each model I tried. The WRG3 were excellent in the snow but the treadwear and dry performance was average (Enough for my driving needs, however). The WRG4 were slightly worse in the snow compared to the WRG4 (Still decent) but leaps better in dry performance and rain. The problem with the WRG4 was the susceptibility to dry rot and overall "wear" from normal driving. They have been punctured, misshapen, and suffered "premature" treadwear compared to what was advertised as the expected tread-life of the tire. But given how well they perform in my 4-season climate state, I would rate them highly. Tire noise is minimal, performance all around is outstanding, and minimal diminishing of performance through treadwear.

Pros: minimal tire noise, outstanding performance
Cons: susceptible to dry rot, premature wear
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Maxxis Tires

I had 2.6 on mine and hated them. Too draggy heavy and slow. Switched to 2.4 all round and it's much more responsive in corners. I'm running Maxxis Ardent exo. No good for wet sloppy stuff,but great for dry or gritty trails.

Pros: more responsive in corners
Cons: no good for wet
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Nokia Tires

Nokian Outposts: 2,390 mi. 9.8% worse efficiency. Would not recommend Nokians: Probably great offroad. Nothing short of scary on road. These tires are totally overwhelmed with the weight and power combo of the Rivian quad platform.

Pros: great offroad
Cons: scary on road
Mileage: 2390 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
1 ... 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 ... 90

Write your review

Help others - share your experience with this part.

Other comparisons
Loading...