Tires Nokia or Barum

Nokia Tires

For a guy who lives in Finnish coast. We used Nokian since it is local, but other brands and models that I often see are Michelin X Ice and Michelin studded tyre variant, Continental Viking Contact or its studded variant, lastly Goodyear Ultragrip Ice or its studded variant.

Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Nokia Tires
acejavelin69
  • Grip:
  • Noise:
Rating 4.0

My work van has the Nokian Remedy WR G5 after coming off of Toyo Celsius (yeah, never going down the Toyo road again with a passenger all-weather tire, at least in the foreseeable future), so far they have been solid and performed well this fall, much quieter and more stable than the Toyos...

Pros: much quieter, more stable
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Nokia Tires

Im a high mileage driver 80k per year for work driving across Canadian Prairies and into Rocky mountains and I take the Nokian R5 every winter. You get -40 black ice roads with high cross winds in a tall minivan and never hit the ditch or gotten into accident with them. Handles deep snow with 0 issues too.

Pros: Handles deep snow, high mileage
Mileage: 80000 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Nokia Tires

i run 195/60R16 Nokian Haakepelittas for winter and brother let me tell YOU, i'm very cautious about when i get into VTEC while driving on dry asphalt with them.

Pros: good for winter
Cons: cautious on dry asphalt
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Nokia Tires

I have just over 6500 miles on my set of Nokian nAT LT275/65/20s. Echoing some of the other replies here... I've had the opposite experience and for me, overall they have performed simply better than the OEM Pirellis.

Pros: quieter on the road
Cons: gobble up pebbles
Mileage: 6500 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Nokia Tires

I have the opposite experience. 4,000 miles on the tires so far and my efficiency is *better* than the Pirellis by about 5%. They are better off-road, handle the sand dunes better than Pirellis

Pros: better off-road, better efficiency
Mileage: 4000 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Nokia Tires

Interesting review. I’ve been running my Nokian for over 13000 miles and I haven’t experienced what you have on the road. I’ve felt they are quite stable and handle super awesome compared to the stock AT Pirelli.

Pros: quite stable, handle awesome
Mileage: 13000 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Nokia Tires

Running Nokian Hakka R2 on the CX-5 and Vredestein Wintrac on the Focus same as last year. Usually don't swap until Thanksgiving though. On a related note, I think these are the last dedicated winter tires I'm going to buy. I've been running two sets for 10 years now and even in the snowier years, I don't feel like it's been worth it in this part of Ohio. The new All Weather tires seem like they've done a good job with snow/ice, yet still keeping dry/wet traction to decent levels. I've got my eye on the Michelin CrossClimates going forward.

Vehicle: Mazda
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Nokia Tires

Got mine a few weeks ago. Can't say I'm crazy about them. I drive a Prius Prime. On stock tires I got about 95+mpg(summer) on my 120mi daily commute. When I got G4, I was getting ~85mpg(summer). When I got G5, it dropped to about 75mpg(now). With just the gas engine, I got about 55mpg on stock tires, ~49 on G4, and something like ~45mpg or a bit higher on G5. I know new tires are generally more draggy. But this kind of number is still concerning, even though G5 has certified low rolling resistance and G4 didn't

Pros: low rolling resistance
Cons: decreased MPG
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
1 ... 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 ... 73

Write your review

Help others - share your experience with this part.

Other comparisons
Loading...