Tires Nexen or BFGoodrich

BFGoodrich Tires

Go with BF Goodrich Comp-2's. I've had a set for over 4 years and over 50K miles. They are nearing the end of their life but still very sticky even in the wet.

Pros: very sticky even wet
Vehicle: Mazda 6
Mileage: 80000 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Nexen Tires

Skratka, gume sem prodal (in imel zraven moralnega mačka, ker sem prodal nekaj kar je lahko življenjsko nevarno) in dost na pamet kupil Nexen. Za enkrat po nekih 10k kilometrih nimam pripomb. V sneg so šle lepo, na mokrem in suhem pa grejo v ovinek kot po tirnicah.

Pros: dobre na snegu, mokrem
Cons: brez pripomb zaenkrat
Mileage: 10000 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
BFGoodrich Tires

For those looking to run K02's year round- they have sub par wet and slush traction. Fantastic in all other instances. Amazing in deep snow.

Pros: Amazing in deep snow, Fantastic in other instances
Cons: sub par wet traction, sub par slush traction
Vehicle: Nissan
Part number: K02
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Nexen Tires

If you are going for less than 40 thickness, dont buy cheap. For example, 235/20/35 nexen is bad, very bad. I had it and went for a check up and found out a bulge growing like a tumor on the inner side of the tire.

Cons: bulge growing like tumor
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
BFGoodrich Tires
TriggernometryPhD
  • Grip:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 1.0

I’ve had KO2’s on my Jeep Wrangler, RAM Rebel, and my gf’s 4Runner. They’re impossible to balance, caused a death wobble on my Jeep, and aren’t snow rated (compared to Nitto’s). I swapped over to the Ridge Grapplers for all 3 platforms and will never ever look back.

Cons: impossible to balance, death wobble
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
1 ... 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 ... 58

Write your review

Help others - share your experience with this part.

Other comparisons
Loading...