Tires MICHELIN or Uniroyal

MICHELIN Tires

Absolutely. I got them for a 23 Jetta and the difference between stock and this is insane. Unreal grip, and I haven’t lost control yet in about 15k miles ever, not even as much as a burnout (which was very common on the stock kumhos).

Pros: unreal grip
Cons: less mileage
Mileage: 24140 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
MICHELIN Tires

Just got CC2s for my 23 CRV and the performance is night and day from the OEM tires! We've had a weird stretch of snow in MN lately and they've been as good as advertised!

Pros: performance is night and day
Vehicle: Honda
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
MICHELIN Tires

I have been through a set and yes they are worth the money. They are great all weather tires but I will say this when it comes to deeper snow and ice you won't beat a dedicated snow tire like Blizzaks. I ran my Cross CLimates 2s on my pruis year round and did great with them.

Pros: great all weather tires
Cons: worse than snow tires
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
MICHELIN Tires

Love ‘em. Way better than factory tires (Bridgestone) on our RX. And better than the similar Goodyears from 15 years ago. Very quiet and great handling.

Pros: very quiet, great handling
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
MICHELIN Tires
darklogic85
  • Grip:
  • Noise:
Rating 4.0

We put them on my wife's crossover/SUV and liked them. The road noise was slightly more than her previous set, which I think was Michelin Primary Tour A/S, if I recall. However, the snow performance on the CC was much better. We live in the Chicago suburbs, so having the better traction and grip in the snow was a worthwhile trade off for the road noise.

Pros: better snow performance
Cons: more road noise
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
MICHELIN Tires

Just put them on my wife’s Crosstrek, she immediately said she felt more confident in the car. I drove it for the first time in snow a few days ago and was very surprised at how well it did. Would absolutely buy again.

Pros: felt more confident
Vehicle: Subaru
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
MICHELIN Tires

I have an appointment Monday to get my current CC2s replaced with a fresh set of CC2s. I got 40k miles out of them, which is good enough for me. They are great in the rain/wet, with excellent hydroplane resistance, and they are very capable in the snow and ice.

Pros: great in rain/wet
Mileage: 64373 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
MICHELIN Tires

I live in southern Ontario in Canada and after one winter of driving around mainly in the city I decided that they weren\u2019t enough especially when going up any sort of incline with snow on the ground. I recently got a set of Michelin Ice-X tires and it makes a world of a difference. In the end if there\u2019s anything more than a light dusting on the ground dedicated winters is the way to go. Also for context I drive a FWD Volvo V50. All in all they are great but as someone else said. Jack of all trades, master of none.

Pros: great all around
Cons: not enough grip
Vehicle: Volvo V50
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
MICHELIN Tires

I’ve run both, the Nokians are the better tire. I genuinely was not impressed with the CC2, snow/ice braking was pathetic.

Pros: Nokians are better tire
Cons: pathetic snow/ice braking
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
1 ... 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 ... 285

Write your review

Help others - share your experience with this part.

Other comparisons
Loading...