Tires MICHELIN or Sailun

MICHELIN Tires
Thinkin_bout_ants
  • Grip:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 4.0

+1 for Michelin Pilot Sport 4s. Had the Cup 2’s on my PP2 (305 front and rear), they lasted 7,500 miles, lots of grip but no grip when cold or damp. Switched to PS4’s currently with 21,000 miles, and probably another ~10,000 left in them. Much better all weather performance, and they had ~90% of the grip of the Cup 2’s. Also added benefit of a slightly softer ride due to a softer sidewall.

Pros: better all weather performance, softer ride
Cons: less grip than Cup 2
Mileage: 21000 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
MICHELIN Tires

Have an SL5 and upgraded to Zipp 303 firecrest just because it was such a good deal, $1,400 delivered. I went with Michelin Power Road and very happy

Pros: very happy with Michelin
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
MICHELIN Tires
vdubinagain
  • Grip:
  • Noise:
Rating 4.5

If you don’t do a lot of spirited driving the Michelin Cross Climate 2 have served me and I live in NJ. They are quiet and track really nice. Plus the 60,000 mile warranty is a plus. They come in both H & V ratings. I run them on my 2009 2 Door Rabbit S.

Pros: quiet, track really nice, good warranty
Vehicle: Volkswagen
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
MICHELIN Tires

After the first commute in the rain with the factory all seasons, I purchased a set of Michelin PSAS4. These have done remarkably well here in North Texas. I can highly recommend them. Recently I had my first “panic” stop and they were great. The only thing I won’t take them on is ice (which we get here) but a set of studded tires are a bit overkill here, and probably not legal, so I didn’t drive on the ice.

Pros: remarkably well, great panic stop, highly recommend
Cons: not for ice
Vehicle: Volkswagen
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
MICHELIN Tires
Echidna
  • Grip:
  • Noise:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 4.5

When I had my GLI, I immediately change the Hankooks out for Pirelli PZeros; they were way to stiff and made the car unstable. Swapped them out for Michelin AS 3+ which was a night and day difference. Relatively smooth and quiet ride, confident handling, excellent grip, good wet performance. I live in Southern California so I can't comment on snow. I used to have Contiental DWS06+ on my old 3 Series. Thats a great tire too, but more focused on comfort over the Michelin.

Pros: smooth ride, quiet ride, confident handling, excellent grip, good wet performance
Cons: too stiff, unstable
Vehicle: Volkswagen
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
MICHELIN Tires
bentin
  • Grip:
  • Noise:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 4.0

Just FYI, there’s a Michelin AS4 now. Much better ride, quieter and slightly better snow performance than the rough and loud AS3+ (I’ve had both on this car). Just note that any of these performance snow tires are not good snow tires by any stretch. If you’re in the Northeast, get proper snows. I’m in Austin and have them just for trips to NM, but wouldn’t want to use them for proper winters.

Pros: better ride, quieter, better snow performance
Cons: not good for proper winters
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
MICHELIN Tires
mrothwell
  • Grip:
  • Noise:
Rating 2.5

We had a set of these on our Rogue, and I wasn\u2019t really blown away by them. Tread life was awful, which really surprised me. Granted, wet grip was very good and they rode quietly, but I wasn\u2019t that impressed with them overall.

Pros: wet grip very good
Cons: awful tread life
Vehicle: Nissan
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
MICHELIN Tires

Dude. Ran the michellins, ran the Kumhos and twice have run Dunlop SP5000s .. run the dunlops. They're sub $100/tire, grip much better than the kumhos both wet and dry, take longer to wear and are just all around a better tire. Far better than the michellins, for a fraction of the price.

Pros: better grip, longer wear
Cons: worse than Dunlops
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source

Write your review

Help others - share your experience with this part.

Other comparisons
Loading...