Tires MICHELIN or Pirelli

MICHELIN Tires

18x8 Neuspeed RSe52 with Michelin AS3's in 235/40 ZR18 on stock suspension. I'm debating VWR springs, but don't want to ruin the DCC.

Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Pirelli Tires
fortyfive1911a1
  • Grip:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 5.0

I believe those were what I had on a Mustang GT. I know they were Pirelli P Zeros but can't remember any more specifics. They were great tires. Had 30k miles on them when I traded in the car and they still had quite a bit of life left.

Pros: great tires, good life
Mileage: 48280 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Pirelli Tires
herkguy
  • Grip:
  • Noise:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 5.0

I have been running the P7AS Plus for over 20k and they are still smooth, quiet and excellent handling. Zero complaints with these tires.

Pros: smooth, quiet, excellent handling
Cons: zero complaints
Mileage: 20000 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
MICHELIN Tires

I have the Michelin Premiers and they're a great tire. I have 70+ k miles on mine with 5mm tread left. They're excellent in rain (even now) and snow.

Pros: great tire, excellent in rain
Mileage: 70000 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Pirelli Tires
NAK's B7
  • Grip:
  • Noise:
Rating 5.0

I had P7s(17\") installed on my 2013 SEL 4 weeks ago and the difference with the crappy Hankooks is night and day...quieter,braking and handling are transformed.

Pros: quieter, braking and handling
Cons: crappy Hankooks
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Pirelli Tires
Brhino
  • Grip:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 5.0

I went by the specs and got 225/40/18. They fit well and have a much wider tread and overall look than the stock Pirelli P7s I replaced.

Pros: wider tread, better look
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Pirelli Tires
Jack Watts
  • Grip:
  • Noise:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 4.5

I went with the Pirelli. I'm in Seattle, and had a chance to push them in the recent rain. Great traction in the wet, reasonable traction in dry, low road noise and reasonable comfort at 39/37psi. Very pleased with the tires.

Pros: great wet traction, low road noise
Cons: reasonable dry traction
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
MICHELIN Tires

Energysavers arent so good on wet surfaces, but on normal driving I did not have any problems conserning traction. I had them at rear for 2 years. They last very long.

Pros: long lasting, normal traction
Cons: bad on wet surfaces
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
MICHELIN Tires

The o.e. tires where Continental Conti's but these results are from the present Michelin's. I didn't have the Conti's on long and unfortunately I never closely watched the MPG before going to the Michelins. the Conti's were slippery feeling and I see they are rated LRR, which I knew nothing about at the time. The mpg dropped w/ the Michelins... especially with lower pressure.

Cons: mpg dropped, lower pressure
Vehicle: Ford Taurus
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source

Write your review

Help others - share your experience with this part.

Other comparisons
Loading...