Tires MICHELIN or NANKANG

MICHELIN Tires

I'm a fan of nokian (hakkas, and also Nordman North), but I've also used Goodyear (ultra grip), Firestone (Winter fire/Winter Force), Bridgestone (blizzak), and most recently Michelin (x-ice snow, made in Canada - elbows up!), and they've all been excellent.

Pros: they've all been excellent
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
MICHELIN Tires

My current one is an 18 with Michelin cross climate 2s on it. I have to intentionally make it slide in order for it to happen. I think there has been one instance that was not intentional.

Pros: intentionally make it slide
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
MICHELIN Tires
Farentino
  • Grip:
  • Noise:
Rating 4.0

Got them on my model 3 (2020) and changed my Michelin pilot sport 4. Great grip but ooh wow what an extra road ( humming) sound. That\u2019s the only con I experience.

Pros: great grip
Cons: extra road sound
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
MICHELIN Tires

I have Michelin cross climate on plaid and I drive like a lunatic currently at 38k miles and i think I have 10kish more miles left i think.

Pros: good mileage
Mileage: 38000 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
MICHELIN Tires

I have a Chrysler Pacifica and the factory tires on that were pretty awful in the snow and ice. When it was time to replace them I went with the Michelin Crossclimate 2. It was done in early January so could easily compare to the old tires and there was a significant improvement.

Pros: significant improvement
Cons: pretty awful
Vehicle: Chrysler Pacifica
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
MICHELIN Tires

Been driving in Canadian winters with X-Ice\u2019s for the past 3 winters and have never had any issues. Always feel safe on the road with them, and I\u2019ve had to drive through blizzards several times.

Pros: feel safe on road
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
MICHELIN Tires

Picked up a new set of Cross Climate 2’s over the weekend. Handling is great, especially in the rain. Aesthetically, I think they look super cool and unique. They have an aggressive look to them.

That being said, I did not do my due diligence beforehand and let the guy at discount t*re give me the run down on them. One thing he failed to mention was the lack of efficiency they bring (not blaming him). In my first couple of drives I noticed my wh/mi to be well over 300 and in one instance on a 5 mile drive it was 395 wh/mi. Crazy! This is in comparison to my average of 252 wh/mi for the last 5k miles I’ve driven. It’s important to note that I like to accelerate fast and have had the heat on due to the cold weather coming in (Chicago native).

I wanted to see how much of a difference it made if I changed my driving habits so for the past 15 miles or so. I turned “chill” mode on and turned off the AC system and have averaged around 210 wh/mi. Nice to know that efficiency is still attainable just a bit sad that I will be losing 30%+ of range when driving how I normally do.

Hoping that with time they will break in and I will see that number go down a bit. I will update the thread as I put more miles on them.

Pros: great handling, aggressive look
Cons: reduced efficiency, range loss
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
MICHELIN Tires
Namuori
  • Grip:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 2.0

The OEM tires - Michelin EnergySaver AS - are great for efficiency and pretty bad for everything else. Went through two sets, and both were consistently bad in rain and snow. One of the tires on the second set got ripped on the *sidewall* as it hit a pothole, and I found out later that the sidewalls were indeed a bit of weakness for them.

Pros: great for efficiency
Cons: bad in rain, weak sidewalls
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
1 ... 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 ... 290

Write your review

Help others - share your experience with this part.

Other comparisons
Loading...