Tires MICHELIN or Maxxis

Maxxis Tires
Fyvz
  • Grip:
Rating 4.0

I've gone from XR4s to DHR/DHF. If there is an increase in rolling resistance, the only place I think I notice it is when I'm on a very gentle downward slope, and I wonder if I'd accelerate due to gravity a little faster on the XR4s. On the other hand, when I'm doing steep technical climbing in the saddle, and putting down the kind of power that made the XR4 lose traction, the DHR has never spun out.

Pros: DHR never spun out
Cons: increase in rolling resistance
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Maxxis Tires

Having ridden the XR5, XR/SE4, DHF, DHR2, Dissector the XR5 is closest to the DHR2 3C EXO. If you liked the XR5 as a front, you'll get along really well with the DHR2.

Pros: good front tire
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Maxxis Tires

Looks like the dhr2/aggressor would be the closest match looking at the tread and tread size. You could go with the slightly slower (contentious claim on here) but more common front dhf/aggressor. I prefer the dhr2 over the dhf but giving the assegai a try once trails are opened here.

Pros: prefer dhr2 over dhf
Cons: slightly slower
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
MICHELIN Tires
silverxt
  • Grip:
  • Noise:
Rating 3.0

My TLX came with Michelin Primacy A/S tires and they were very quiet . They were not grippy enough for my liking though, so I ditched them for the Continental DWS06+.

Pros: very quiet
Cons: not grippy enough
Vehicle: Acura TLX
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
MICHELIN Tires
Zim
  • Grip:
Rating 1.0

Honestly, the Michelins are generally more recommended here over the Conti's... and after 35k on my 99, the best thing I ever did was get rid of the frickin Michelins, and replaced 'em with Bridgestone Potenza's... SOOOO much better wet traction

Pros: better wet traction
Cons: mediocre wet traction
Mileage: 56310 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source

Write your review

Help others - share your experience with this part.

Other comparisons
Loading...