Tires MICHELIN or Kumho

MICHELIN Tires

I'd just get a good set of all-season tires if you need them (Michelin cross climate are the gold standard)

Pros: gold standard, good set
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Kumho Tires

Upgraded to pilot sport AS at 30k miles because the Kumhos were no longer gripping in the rain (even though there was plenty of tread left).

Pros: better grip
Cons: poor rain grip
Mileage: 48280 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
MICHELIN Tires
EatPumpkinPie
  • Grip:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 5.0

I just installed the Michelin cross climate 2, and it may be the best tire I’ve ever owned, for any car. Even my wife noticed a huge difference.

Pros: best tire ever owned, huge difference
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
MICHELIN Tires

I have cross climate 2s that are highly rated all weather tires for winter driving. They're phenomenal. My current FWD car drives about the same as my old AWD car did thanks to them.

Pros: highly rated, phenomenal
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
MICHELIN Tires

I buy Michelin Pilot Sport all-season tires because their performance means my safety. (Also because they handle well when I’m having fun)

Pros: performance means my safety
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
MICHELIN Tires

For a second vehicle that still has to be solid in snow, I’d go Michelin X-Ice Snow and not even think twice. They bite way harder on packed snow than any A/T and make a heavy truck like a Silverado feel way more planted on cold mornings. I ran them on my old 1500 and the difference in braking/steering vs. all-terrains was huge.

Pros: solid in snow
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
MICHELIN Tires

a dedicated winter like the Michelin X-Ice Snow makes a huge difference on those slick mornings and unplowed side streets.

Pros: huge difference
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
MICHELIN Tires

I used them through last winter, which had some extremely icy periods. I had one sketchy incident, where I hit a patch of ice going about 5 mph and just could not stop, but I don’t think Blizzaks would have saved me there considering how slow I was already going. Other than that, they performed fine for me.

Pros: performed fine
Cons: could not stop on ice
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
MICHELIN Tires

This looks like to be a Michelin PS 3 or 4. If my guess is correct, these are sport tire which means soft rubber compound, and because of that they degrade (harden) fast. From experience, with normal use, they are good for 2-3 years of driving, then they get horribly bad (hard). Above 4 years they become hard like hockey pucks - the rubber looks shiny with lots of micro cracking and they are (from experience) deadly in the rain. So, judging from the picture one (i see micro cracking) and the fact they are 5 years old: They are gone. Tread depth is irrelevant now. They are so hard that you cant wear them down not even in 100.000km. Btw. about 6-7mm is the tread depth when these (Michelin PS) tires are new.

Pros: good for 2-3 years
Cons: degrade fast, harden quickly, deadly in rain, micro cracking
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
1 ... 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 ... 317

Write your review

Help others - share your experience with this part.

Other comparisons
Loading...