Tires MICHELIN or DUNLOP

MICHELIN Tires
jakeodom961
  • Grip:
  • Noise:
Rating 3.0

For me, Altima FWD, they are a little worse than my dedicated snow tire when I’ve ran them (I’ve gotten stuck once and had to put on chains). I like the blizzaks better but the CC2s do ok. CC2s also get slightly worse mpg than the blizzaks/are a little louder.

Pros: do ok
Cons: worse than snow tires
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
MICHELIN Tires

I just put them on my Forester and am now struggling to maintain 30mpg whilst before I was sitting between 34 - 36 depending on how many red lights I caught that week. I kind of wish I had gone with the Defender 2 series or another touring tire personally as I already have Blizzak WS90s on my Wrx STi that I can use for heavy snow

Pros: good for heavy snow
Cons: struggling to maintain mpg
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
MICHELIN Tires
Ridge00
  • Grip:
  • Noise:
Rating 2.0

My experience is they are noisy and don\u2019t wear evenly unless you rotate religiously every 3000-5000 miles. I drive a 4WD truck, but I find the Michelin Defender M/S2 to be a better tire.

Pros: better tire
Cons: noisy, uneven wear
Mileage: 8047 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
MICHELIN Tires

No. I live in Michigan and was severely disappointed with the Michelin CC2. The packed-snow braking, and lateral grip leave a LOT to be desired. In our neighborhood with packed snow the car just slid… And slid… and kept sliding. Even my wife exclaimed “aren’t these new tires” lol. The packed-snow and Ice traction is no different than a basic all-season tire. The only thing these tires excelled at is deep-puddles and rain, they really shed water fast.

Pros: shed water fast
Cons: poor snow braking
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
1 ... 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 ... 313

Write your review

Help others - share your experience with this part.

Other comparisons
Loading...