Tires MICHELIN or BRIDGESTONE

BRIDGESTONE Tires

The Blizzaks always performed better, in my experience, and my WS90s have lasted just fine. I’m not sure how they’d be considered bad on dry roads, can’t say I’ve had any issues.

Pros: superior performance, good longevity, no issues on dry roads
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
BRIDGESTONE Tires

I’ve got blizzaks on both vehicles. Only ran generic winter tires before that and the improvement was crazy.

Pros: significant improvement, excellent performance
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
MICHELIN Tires

I would stand by the Michelin Cross Climate 2 as a year round tire. I found it fantastic in the rain and snow. I think the trade off was that the ice performance was worse than a traditional snow and ice tire, but overall, it was just fantastic and if my current car hadn't come with new tires, I would have just bought those again.

Pros: fantastic in rain, fantastic in snow, overall fantastic
Cons: worse on ice
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
MICHELIN Tires

I ran them for a decade on my old M135i. They’re great tyres, if a little compromised compared to the newer generation. They’re not great in the wet or cold, and the performance does start to drop off before you get to the legal tread depth minimum.

Pros: great tyres
Cons: compromised, not great in wet/cold, performance drops off
Vehicle: BMW
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
BRIDGESTONE Tires
Spicywolff
  • Noise:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 2.0

Extreme summer class is a tire where your comfort’s not even on the radar. I took my re71RS on a hour highway drive to inital heat cycle then. Way more rough and loud then Conti ECS02 I daily

Cons: rough and loud
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source

Write your review

Help others - share your experience with this part.

Other comparisons
Loading...