-18
No data
-3
No data
-18
No data
-3
No data
I’ve been using them for a few years now and we’ve currently got them on a Mazda 6 and a Saab 9-3 and they’re fine. Mine are rated B in the wet and I’ve had zero problems with them.
Idk if the showroom guys have control over that because I asked for Apollo and I got MRF. The sales guy told me the bikes get allocated at random.
But coming to the tyre itself I would say the MRFs are good only. Never felt the lack of grip except one time when my tyre was in slushy mud. Appearance wise also the MRF's look a little wider compared to the Apollo's since the tyre profile is more curved in the latter if that matters to you.
Economical and life span, I would recomend mrf wanderer. 6k per tire and will give you 70k+ km life.
Harder tires like MRF, Ceat, JK etc., will offer good lifetime and low wear and tear.
but given they're landsails anyway i'd definitely replace them with something (better preferably) just for piece of mind
Need to replace the front soon, I hate the Zappers the longevity is very good it lasts ages but the grip and breaking is pathetic.
I have beef with MRF, their compound is so hard it makes it seem like I am on roller skates in a wet skating ring when it’s raining.
I have them on the front of my 17 plate i40 and seem fairly new. Reviews on them don't sound good at all. The fuel efficiency is grade e and I find them really loud when driving at speed.
Won’t buy MRFs though because they will absolutely get you killed if you push the bike a little bit more than average.
Landsail tires at 150mph. Yeah would not recommend...
Write your review
Help others - share your experience with this part.