Tires Kumho or Nokia

Nokia Tires

Nokian Hakapelita q's My vw dealership here in wpg was able to source them for $122 a tyre The fin's have lot's of ice roads. Nokain's are great ice tyres. In wpg there is alot of ice.

Pros: great ice tyres
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Nokia Tires
matt007
  • Grip:
  • Noise:
Rating 5.0

We've got a FWD model Passat, and we use Nokian Hakkapeliitas in the winter We went out on closed (snowed out) roads in southern Oregon We were passing snow plows and SUVs left and right Not even a bit of wheelspin, it was just like being on dry ground, only quieter 4motion is probably worth it in the northeast

Pros: no wheelspin, like dry ground, quiet
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Kumho Tires
juiced
  • Grip:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 4.0

Kumhos are awesome! I had them on my civic and Ive hit at least 160 in that car! They are very comfortable and they handle very well.

Pros: very comfortable, handle well
Cons: treadwear was sooo bad
Vehicle: Honda Civic
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Nokia Tires

Just in case any one is looking at four season tires look at the hakka NRW. Very similar to the hakka Q in tread design but a harder rubber.

Pros: similar to hakka Q
Cons: harder rubber
Part number: NRW
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Kumho Tires

As for the Kuhmo 712 it is a great, cheap tire for dry and rain conditions but in the bigger sizes that I have experience with (i.e. 225/45ZR17) they stunk in the snow.

Pros: great tire, cheap
Cons: stunk in the snow
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Kumho Tires

i have kuhmo supras(195 45 16) and they suck for traction. SUCK I had dunlop w10's, they were ok, but lasted like 15k miles. thats my input

Pros: Dunlop ok
Cons: Kuhmo suck for traction
Mileage: 15000 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source

Write your review

Help others - share your experience with this part.

Other comparisons
Loading...