Tires Kumho or GENERAL TIRE

GENERAL TIRE Tires

I have been running Generals for a few years now. The Exclaim UHP was replaced with the G-Max AS-03 a few years back. They have served me well. Longevity is not great, but traction per dollar has been good.

Pros: traction per dollar good
Cons: longevity is not great
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Kumho Tires
Sump
  • Grip:
  • Noise:
Rating 4.0

Yep, haven't ran those Falkens, but have run the Kumhos. On my 2nd set of the Evos on my summer wheels for the R, great tire for the money. It's no PS2 or Direzza, but I'm not a racecar driver either. And +1 running them a little higher on PSI.

Pros: great tire for money
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Kumho Tires
youthavenger
  • Grip:
  • Noise:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 4.0

I had the Kumho on my Fx45 before the current Kooks. Overall, I prefer the Hankooks since I feel the ride better, quieter, etc (maybe I am just getting old and need to trade in for an ES300). Plus the Hankooks come with tread warranty, no? The Kumho were a bit stickier but I felt they wore a bit prematurely.

Pros: ride better, quieter
Cons: wore a bit prematurely
Vehicle: Infiniti
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
GENERAL TIRE Tires
PokeyHokie
  • Grip:
  • Noise:
Rating 5.0

I am currently running a set of studdable (but not studded) General Altimax Arctic tires. They are phenomenal in the snow. A tad loud at 80+ on the highway in the dry, but very good overall in the wet/dry.

Pros: phenomenal in the snow, very good overall
Cons: tad loud on highway
Vehicle: Mazda 3
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
GENERAL TIRE Tires
ozzy1975
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 4.0

I am now using General Tire Altimax Arctic and they are nearly as good....not as 'fine' of a ride as the nokkians, but nokkian is high quality rubber and the price reflects that.

Pros: very good, decent value
Cons: not as fine of ride
Mileage: 17500 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Kumho Tires
L33t A2
  • Grip:
  • Noise:
Rating 4.0

I ran those Kumhos on the Volvo 850 Turbo I had, I liked them a lot. The only downside was being that the car was heavy, you could feel the sidewall flex in hard cornering, then again they are a sport all season and not a true summer tire so I think they fit the bill nicely.

Pros: liked them a lot, fit the bill nicely
Cons: sidewall flex in hard cornering
Vehicle: Volvo 850
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Kumho Tires
vdub4lyf
  • Grip:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 4.5

I like my Kumho's 205/45/16's, I have about 15,000 mi. on them, still alot of meat. There 2 yrs. old still looks new. They cost me $125 per tire.

Pros: good treadwear, looks new
Mileage: 24140 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
GENERAL TIRE Tires

I had the General Altimax HP's on my X3 and they were a way better than the Conti's they replaced. Every set of Conti's I've ever had make way too much noise. :thumbup::thumbup: on the General's

Pros: way better (General)
Cons: too much noise (Continental)
Vehicle: BMW X3
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Kumho Tires

I have the LX Platinums on my GLI. After 20,000+miles, they show little wear. Handling is definitely noticeably worse than the original summer tires, but not awful. Winter traction was surprisingly good.

Pros: little wear, good winter traction
Cons: worse handling than summer tires
Vehicle: Volkswagen
Mileage: 20000 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Kumho Tires
branedamag
  • Grip:
  • Noise:
Rating 2.0

I have the Kumhos and I don't like them. They are quiet, and seem to last forever, to my chagrin. Personally, I'd rather trade a little tread life for more performance, but they might be what you are looking for. A word of warning, though: they break loose pretty easily when it's wet.

Pros: quiet, seem to last
Cons: break loose easily
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
1 ... 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 ... 80

Write your review

Help others - share your experience with this part.

Other comparisons
Loading...