Tires Kumho or FEDERAL

Kumho Tires
rynodyno312
  • Grip:
  • Noise:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 5.0

I just got rid of my Falken 512s. They were not good (loud, hard, wore out fast), but for that price pretty much nothing is. I ended up going with Kumho ASX's and I'm pretty happy with them. They have a 30k mile warranty and ride much better than the Falken 512s, are quieter, and offer just as much grip. I think they run around $110/tire.

Pros: ride much better, quieter, good grip (Kumho)
Cons: loud, hard, wore out fast (Falken)
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Kumho Tires
mrcandyman
  • Grip:
  • Noise:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 4.0

Personally I had Kumhos before and they were pretty good, I had no issues.

Pros: pretty good, no issues
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Kumho Tires

I have some decent Kumhos on mine (used to have Gislaved Nordfrost 5 on my MKIV, but they wore very quickly) and my Golf is perfectly fine in the snow.

Pros: perfectly fine in snow
Cons: wore very quickly
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
FEDERAL Tires

Try, Federal RS-R. It should be equal to XS in performance but cheaper. I have the 195/50/15 on Miata and I think it is better than my previous Falken Azenis.

Pros: equal to XS, cheaper
Vehicle: Mazda
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Kumho Tires
thenew3
  • Grip:
  • Noise:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 4.0

Got Kumho ECSTA 4X installed on my wagon almost 2 months ago. 235/40/18 95XL. They replaced the good year eagle GT's. About 2k miles on them now, they are quiet and softer riding then the good year, but doesn't grip as well on dry road. (i.e. with the good year, I could not get the front tires to spin from a dead stop even if I floor it, with the kumho, they spin for a fraction of a second before the 4motion kicks in) haven't had rain so don't know how they handle in wet. But they are definitely more comfortable than the good year.

Pros: quiet, softer riding
Cons: doesn't grip as well
Mileage: 2000 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
FEDERAL Tires
amtrakjack
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 4.0

The wheels look absolutely great and they drive great, the driving feel with such a light wheel is amazing. One of the wheels wasn’t perfectly round and had a small hop to it... I put 1500 miles on them and the vibration never bugged me, even on a road trip to Chicago.

Pros: driving feel is amazing
Cons: slight vibration above 85
Vehicle: Mazda
Mileage: 2414 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
FEDERAL Tires
Jesse_717
  • Grip:
  • Noise:
Rating 4.0

Got my tires yesterday and went and got them mounted this morning. Liking them so far, hardly any stretch. I'll have my coilovers in a couple weeks then to see how they are on the car. 165/55/14 Federals on 14x6 wheels

Pros: hardly any stretch
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Kumho Tires

I have 195/50R15 KU25s over 8" and compared to the same sized Falken ZE329, they don't look as good. The sidewall bulges out on the Kumhos.

Cons: sidewall bulges out
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Kumho Tires
JDam
  • Grip:
Rating 2.0

khumo? forget about em, wet traction is dangerously low. i prefer Bridgestone, the potenza line. RE-01 R for summer compound. 960 as Pole Position for all weather compound. keep in mind that my perspective is from a performance standpoint, i dont give a crap about how many miles i get out of a tire so long as i enjoy it while i have it.

Pros: good for performance
Cons: low wet traction
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
1 ... 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 ... 54

Write your review

Help others - share your experience with this part.

Other comparisons
Loading...