Tires Hankook or YOKOHAMA

I have those Yokohamas on my 2wd. Mostly highway but occasional forest roads and a 4wd trail I had scouted in a different vehicle to get to a hunting spot. Honestly, I love them. Little to no road noise, and I haven’t had an issue with them.

I have the Yokohama A/T4, just got them, haven’t been OR. Ride is awesome, better MPG’s. Just a little hum from the tires

The Hankook’s are new, I just put them on my 24 Quad. They are outstanding.

I run Yokohama geolanders year round on my tundra and they work great

If cost is an issue, the more economical street tire you can get that has solid track performance is the Hankook RS4. They last forever and are a great tire to learn on.

I live in Canmore and drive a Subaru forester wilderness with the Yokohama G015 (3Peak) and I have never gotten stuck, slid out of control, or had any concern.

I got a new set this year from Discount Tire. Cost me $831 total including tax for four Yokohama GTX all seasons. I’ve driven almost 4,000 miles on them so far and haven’t had an issue yet.

U can stretch em up to 250....won't be ideal performance...but i pushed a set to 265 before the treads seperated.

My 2023 model 3 LR came with Hankook Kinergy GT M&S tires. Based on the tire rack reviews I think they are almost identical to the Hankook Ion tires. 

If so. My experience with the Kinergy tires was not great. While they were super efficient (lifetime average 246wh/mile) they gave up early on spirited cornering on both dry and wet pavement (might be the difference between avoiding a potential accident). They are adequate in winter driving. Where the were outright dangerous was hydroplaning.

Today was my first drive into work on the new Yokohama YK-GTX tires. I normally average just over 5mi/kw, today it was just over 4mi/kw. I expected some range hit with new tires, but this seems a bit much. Is this expected, or is their arbitrary range scoring complete garbage?