Tires Hankook or Nokia

Hankook Tires

I love my Hankook Ions, my MYP had the Pirelli Pzeros as my original set.

One thing that hasn’t been mentioned is the road noise and how much quieter the drive is.

Pros: quieter drive
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Hankook Tires

I’ve had both and the biggest difference I saw was the range hit. I was the sole driver so no difference in driving style - MPS AS4’s were 10% worse. Loved them but would go with the Hankooks were I to do it again.

Pros: would go again
Cons: none
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Hankook Tires
FearTheClown5
  • Noise:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 4.0

The Hankooks are slightly softer absorbing a smidge more of the road. Noise difference between the 2 isn't noticeable at all. The Hankooks are slightly more efficient, lifetime on the Michelins is 306whm and the Hankooks are 297whm(tracked via TeslaMate).

Pros: slightly more efficient
Cons: slightly softer
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Nokia Tires
ChargeThink
  • Grip:
  • Noise:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 4.0

I have Nokian R3 on the Sportwagen and Michelin X-Ice Snow (OEM) on the V60 here in Canada. Once I need to change, will likely go with Nokian. More quiet, comfortable and better on deeper snow.

Pros: quiet, comfortable, better snow
Vehicle: Volkswagen
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Nokia Tires

I have Nokian Hakkapelitta 9 on my Volvo and they’re great.

Pros: great winter tires
Cons: aren’t cheap
Vehicle: Volvo S70
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Hankook Tires

Also in Colorado with 50e. Have 21-inch wheels with factory Hankook “all season” performance run flats. Just ordered a set of Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5s for winter to replace the Hankooks that perform like I’m on an ice rink with bald tires…

Pros: for winter
Cons: perform like on ice
Vehicle: BMW X5
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
1 ... 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 ... 135

Write your review

Help others - share your experience with this part.

Other comparisons
Loading...