Tires Hankook or Kumho

Hankook Tires
FillBk
  • Grip:
  • Noise:
Rating 5.0

Ca alternative, recomand Hankook. Eu am de vara cu clasa A la aderență pe drum umed si 69DB ca zgomot. Sincer, își merită toți banii.

Pros: aderență bună, zgomot redus
Vehicle: Volvo V60
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Hankook Tires
CarmoXX
  • Grip:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 4.0

I’ve run RS4s for the last 3 years. First set lasted 2 years, about 14 track days and 10K miles total between street driving (April to October) and track miles. They saw rain both on track and street without issue. They would have lasted longer but I picked up a puncture on one of them. It’s not a fast tire but it lasts and is very flexible. I’ve driven them in high 30 to low 40 degree weather with no drama.

Pros: lasts long, very flexible
Cons: not a fast tire
Mileage: 16093 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Hankook Tires
Then_Wrongdoer_8568
  • Grip:
  • Noise:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 3.5

For those who are interested, I had the Hankook ION Evo (Summer) tires installed to replace the stock Pirelli P Zero (PZ4) Elect tires on my Tesla Model 3 Performance ('22). There are pros and cons compared to the stock Pirelli tires, in my opinion:

Pros:

- Quieter (especially on highways)

- More comfortable (damping on uneven road surfaces, but uneven road surfaces also less noticeable in the steering)

- Better grip in rain and wet conditions

- Slightly lighter steering feel

- Slightly easier full acceleration straight of the line

- More efficient (+/- 1% less battery consumption per trip)

Cons:

- Steering feel and response are less direct

- Grip during hard cornering is not great (at least, the limit is simply lower than with the Pirellis)

- Overall sportiness is diminished

Pros: quieter, more comfortable, better grip
Cons: less direct steering, less grip
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
1 ... 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 ... 106

Write your review

Help others - share your experience with this part.

Other comparisons
Loading...