Tires Hankook or Falken

Hankook Tires
Awdacity
  • Grip:
  • Noise:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 4.0

My thoughts with the Hankooks on my '25R vs the Bridgestones on my '23R. Hankooks WAY louder but better ride quality & traction.

Pros: better ride quality, traction
Cons: WAY louder
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Falken Tires

Eigentlich sind alle Reifen von nennenswerten Herstellern ziemlich solide. Keine linglong reifen, aber Namen wir Falken, Conti, Michelin, Goodyear sind die gängigsten.

Pros: ziemlich solide
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Falken Tires

I run Wildpeak AT3Ws. They've been pretty good in the summer and perfectly fine in up to 6in of snow and packed snow in Colorado.

Pros: pretty good in summer
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Hankook Tires
According-Bee-6643
  • Grip:
  • Noise:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 3.0

I’m on my second M3. The first came with Michelin the latest on Hankook. The Hankooks are I think slightly quieter but if you enjoy driving definitely go for the Michelin. The Hankooks have very soft sidewalls which gives a slightly soft squishy feel to the steering and much poorer turn in than the Michelin.

Pros: quieter ride
Cons: soft sidewalls, poorer turn
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Falken Tires

Mine were down to 50% tread and didn't have enough traction on snow at ~20k miles. If you drive on serious snow, consider getting rid of them by 15 to 20k miles.

Cons: not enough traction
Mileage: 32187 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Falken Tires

My Crosstrek Limited came with the same Falkens. They were performing poorly in the wet when only half worn. I replaced them at 23k miles when they had 4/32" before winter.

Pros: quiet, good in dry
Cons: poor wet performance
Vehicle: Subaru
Mileage: 37015 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
1 ... 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 ... 157

Write your review

Help others - share your experience with this part.

Other comparisons
Loading...