Tires Hankook or BRIDGESTONE

BRIDGESTONE Tires
yngwie98
  • Grip:
  • Noise:
Rating 4.0

Bought Weatherpeaks instead of CC2 for our Crosstrek, no difference in MPG. They're quieter than the stock Falkens.

Snow traction isn't as good as dedicated winter tires but it's good enough for the winters around here.

Pros: quieter than stock
Cons: snow traction not great
Vehicle: Subaru
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
BRIDGESTONE Tires

If you need dedicated winter tires, best option is to buy a second set of rims and winter specific tires, Blizzaks are a personal fav of mine.

Pros: winter specific tires
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Hankook Tires

Here’s an update on the Hankook tires. They are notably more efficient than the Pirellis. My daily commute was showing an average energy use of 285 Whr/mile pretty consistently. For the past month, it is now at 235 Whr/mile. This is in addition to being notably quieter over most road surfaces.

Pros: more efficient, notably quieter
Mileage: 3000 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Hankook Tires

Slower but vastly more durable tire > outright pace for an 8 hour enduro. And the answer to that is, as always, Hankook RS4.

Pros: vastly more durable tire
Cons: slower tire
Vehicle: BMW
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
BRIDGESTONE Tires

I have 4 track days on my RE71RS on my NB miata and still have a day or two of life left. Roughly ~10 hours

of driving the piss out of those tires.

Pros: day or two left
Vehicle: Mazda
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
BRIDGESTONE Tires

Yep same thing happened to me, my OEM tires were shit. I had like 16k on mine. Normal driving, not aggressive or anything. Literally only lasted a year. Mine were Bridgestones.

Cons: tires were shit
Mileage: 16000 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
1 ... 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 ... 156

Write your review

Help others - share your experience with this part.

Other comparisons
Loading...