Tires Hankook or BRIDGESTONE

I've been rocking Hankook Venuts Prime 2S on my 1997 Civic for about a year and how extremely well they handle everything, especially considering they're DOT16. I'm overall extremely happy with the Hankooks.

I’d consider the Hankook Kinergy P737s. Great tread life, good for smaller vehicles and rated for 70 or 80k miles? First time I used Korean tires, solid performance in wet or dry.

I had them on my Mazda 3 with 45k miles and plenty of tread left.

I got the new Bridgestones from Tirerack, I really like them.

I’ve put two sets of these on my kids cars. They are very decent tires for the price.

I bought 4 new Bridgestone Turanzas the next day and it was like driving a completely different car.

Maiinput ko lang ung meron ako. Hilux reliable. Change oils and filters, battery, brake pads at goma pa lang ginagawa ko sa 100k. Sa takbo kung ano sya day 1 ganun pa din hanggang ngayon.

I've used Nokians for years but tried Blizzak WS-90s this time around because they were a fair bit less expensive. They seem fine but seem to have noticeably more rolling resistance than the Nokian, and I notice it's easier to spin them starting up on dry pavement in cold weather than I'd experienced with Nokian in the past. I'll be switching back to whatever Hakkapeliitta is current once these are worn out.

I have Blizzaks and compared to true studded winter tires like Nokian they are not on the same level. But if you dont have ice and snow all the time they have good wet grip.

I currently have Hankook ION evo AS which I have been otherwise happy with on our model 3 RWD but man they suck in bad weather.

I swapped to 19x8.5 Atomic AW21 wheels (21.3 lbs) with Bridgestone Blizzak 6 XL 235/55R19 tires. So it is a more narrow tire. After noticing my battery percentage dropping surprisingly fast on short trips, I put on the energy app some today and see I'm now using nearly 500 Wh/mi on that same day to day driving. I expected snow tires to have worse rolling resistance, but this seems like a lot. 50% more energy usage equates to a 33% reduction in range. Does that seem normal or excessive?