Got it
We use cookies to collect statistics and improve your experience. Learn more.
Spare parts reviews ➔ All comparisons ➔ FULDA ➔ Barum

Tires FULDA or Barum

Reviews
All
FULDA
Barum
Barum › Tires
Gu733
  • Grip:
Rating 4.0

Le avevo 4 stagioni sulla Fiat punto del 2008, la mia prima auto.

Mi sono trovato molto bene, l'ho tenuta dal 2019 al 2022, sono andato anche sulla neve in montagna, in nevicata piena, e ho avuto zero problemi.

Pros: Mi sono trovato bene
Cons: Poi ho grippato
Vehicle: Fiat Punto
Mileage: 75000 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Barum › Tires
qberserkr
  • Grip:
Rating 4.0

Avute per 4 anni su una c3. Uso misto, in ordine: collina, citt\u00e0, autostrada a velocit\u00e0 sostenuta.

In inverno nevica poco da me, ma le abbiamo testate un paio di settimane fa (vecchie di 4 anni) e siamo usciti senza problemi dal vialetto sterrato e innevato.

Pros: si sono comportate bene
Vehicle: Citroen C3
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Barum › Tires
vargemp
  • Grip:
Rating 5.0

I got new Barums for this winter and they’re doing absolutely fine (also on a Golf). Recently done 110 on snowed highway while everyone else was in the right lane doing like 80 and they felt perfectly stable. On wet road they also seem to do well.

Pros: perfectly stable, do well
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
FULDA › Tires
Master1Blaster
  • Grip:
Rating 5.0

All season neki srednji segment je bolji od nizeg segmenta zimskih i letnjih. Npr Fulda all season je dobra.

Pros: srednji segment bolji
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Barum › Tires
fenea95
  • Grip:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 4.0

Am Barum Polaris 5 si mi-au placut, erau ieftine, acu 3 ani le-am luat cu 1000 toate 4 205/55/R16. Sunt moi, au sant pentru aderenta pe ploaie, dar dupa teste nu par ca exceleaza acolo, eu nu am simtit, iar pe zapada sunt excelente. Barum este sub-brand Continental si au fost facute in UE. Probabil sunt prea moi, si se consuma mai rapid, dar nu ma deranjat, oricum ma lovesc mai intai de vechime decat de cat de consumate sunt, si au tinut 3 sezoane sigur merg si al patrulea. Deasemenea se umplu de pietricele prin gauri. Not top performance, dar ok,

Pros: ieftine, excelente pe zăpadă, durabile
Cons: moi, se umplu de pietricele, performanță medie pe ploaie
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
FULDA › Tires
TuphTuph93
  • Grip:
Rating 3.0

I myself also have allseason, Fulda Multicontrol. So far in those conditions you described they perform allright, but you need to be careful. I’m still not fully convinced to take them to direct snow since I have tried to cross some purely snowy areas and they get stuck.

Pros: perform alright, need care
Cons: get stuck in snow
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Barum › Tires
Justplay567
  • Grip:
Rating 1.0

Der einzige Reifen der mir mal bei 240kmh auf der Autobahn geplatzt ist war einer von Barum (wohl eine Tochtermarke von Continental) hatte damals der Vorbesitzer des Fahrzeuges gekauft und montiert

Cons: Reifen geplatzt bei 240kmh
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
1 2 3 4

Write your review

Help others - share your experience with this part.

Other comparisons
VS

Tires MICHELIN or Continental

VS

Tires MICHELIN or Pirelli

VS

Tires MICHELIN or Falken

VS

Tires MICHELIN or BRIDGESTONE

VS

Tires MICHELIN or Goodyear

VS

Tires MICHELIN or Nokia

VS

Tires MICHELIN or Hankook

VS

Tires MICHELIN or YOKOHAMA

Show all

Which tires to choose — FULDA or Barum?

If choosing tires across many manufacturers, check the part ranking. If your choice is down to two brands, the PartReview part comparisons help.

We compare tires across these categories:

Comparison of tires FULDA and Barum
  1. PR Score.
  2. Overall ranking.
  3. Vote balance.
  4. Average rating.
  5. Number of reviews.
  6. Feature ratings.
  7. Car owners’ choice.

Which tires are better — Barum or FULDA?

In March 2026 on PartReview, tires Barum were overall better than FULDA.

  1. FULDA received a PR Score of 82 out of 100, and Barum scored 77 points.
  2. FULDA ranked 43 in the overall ranking, and Barum ranked 40.
  3. The average rating is higher for FULDA (3.9) than for Barum (3.5).
  4. Tires FULDA have better feature ratings than Barum:
    • Noise - owners believe, that this property for Barum is better than FULDA.
    • Grip - drivers claim, that this property for FULDA is outperforms Barum.
    • Ride comfort - reviews suggest, that this property for Barum is preferred to FULDA.

Which tires are more popular — FULDA or Barum?

In March 2026 on PartReview, tires Barum were overall more popular than FULDA.

By vote balance, tires Barum surpassed FULDA:

  • For FULDA, the ratio of positive (34) to negative (7) votes is 27 votes.
  • For Barum, the ratio of positive (47) to negative (14) votes is 33 votes.

By number of reviews, tires Barum surpassed FULDA:

  • For tires FULDA there are 13 reviews: 10 positive, 2 neutral, 1 negative.
  • For tires Barum there are 20 reviews: 15 positive, 1 neutral, 4 negative.

Which tires do car owners prefer — FULDA or Barum?

In March 2026, according to PartReview, tires FULDA and Barum have not taken top places in car-specific ratings. You can help by adding your review about these manufacturers.

Other comparisons of tires

If this comparison didn’t fully answer your question, there are many others on PartReview.

For example, comparisons of tires FULDA with: MICHELIN, Continental, Pirelli, Falken, BRIDGESTONE, Goodyear, Nokia, Hankook, YOKOHAMA, Toyo.

Also available: comparisons of tires Barum with: MICHELIN, Continental, Pirelli, Falken, BRIDGESTONE, Goodyear, Nokia, Hankook, YOKOHAMA, Toyo.

You can also see who is better among other tires manufacturers: MICHELIN or Continental, MICHELIN or Pirelli, MICHELIN or Falken, MICHELIN or BRIDGESTONE, MICHELIN or Goodyear.

Loading...
›