Tires Firestone or LASSA

Firestone Tires

Yeah, I have 20k with these on my Mazda6 and I wouldn't say they're unresponsive. In fact I would say they're quite responsive in that they like to track in the direction you're turning, so the car gets encouraged to dive into turns. One thing I have noticed is that they feel much more dead if you let them get low. Keep them at 36psi.

Pros: quite responsive, encourages turns
Cons: feel dead when low
Vehicle: Mazda 6
Mileage: 20000 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Firestone Tires

I’m glad the series asked Firestone for a bigger differential in pace between the reds and blacks. A lot of the time last year it seemed largely negligible.

Pros: bigger pace differential
Cons: pace largely negligible
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Firestone Tires

I managed to get her setup with some Firestone all seasons, with hazard warranty for 600 out the door at a Firestone auto center.

Pros: hazard warranty
Vehicle: Toyota
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Firestone Tires

Firestone is a budget “decent” tire. Crossclimate 2 is made to be VERY good in snow and rain (it also lasts the 60,000 miles it claims).

Pros: very good in snow, rain
Cons: budget decent tire
Mileage: 96560 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Firestone Tires

The tires I currently have are Firestone Firehawk Indy 500s, which were on the car when I bought it. For my use case I generally like them, with one exception: wet weather performance. Even though moderate NorCal doesn't see too many rainy days, I've felt myself losing traction/hydroplaning on quite a few occasions. If it weren't for this issue, I could easily see myself just replacing them with another set of Firehawks and calling it a day

Pros: good dry performance
Cons: poor wet weather performance, hydroplaning
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
1 ... 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 ... 34

Write your review

Help others - share your experience with this part.

Other comparisons
Loading...