Tires Falken or Kumho

Falken Tires

I run 285/75/18 Falken Wild Peak ATs. Love the tires. Have almost 70k miles.

Pros: Love the tires
Cons: cost me 1-2mpg
Mileage: 112654 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Falken Tires

I went with Wild Peak AT3W because I’ve got 70k out of them driving on dirt/rock most of the time. My factory tires were about gone in 12k

Pros: high mileage, good durability
Mileage: 70000 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Kumho Tires
DD4cLG
  • Noise:
Rating 4.0

Have the Kumho Ecsta, standard fitted here in the Netherlands. Have to say they are very silent and durable. Drove approx 37k km with them. Have also Continental Premiumcontact winter/snow tyres. Not bad too.

Pros: very silent, durable
Mileage: 37000 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Falken Tires

I replaced the OEM Dunlops on my '21 RAV gas model XLE a few weeks ago with Falken WildPeak A/T Trails in 245/65-17. I have about 900 miles on them now. I have lost consistently only 2 MPG after several cycles of fill ups.

Pros: consistent MPG loss
Cons: 2 MPG loss
Vehicle: Toyota
Mileage: 1448 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Kumho Tires
coolthulu42
  • Grip:
  • Noise:
Rating 5.0

I literally just got these installed last week and I am really happy with them. Way better grip and quieter than the stock falken tires.

Pros: better grip, quieter
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Kumho Tires
BraveSirRyan
  • Grip:
  • Noise:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 3.5

Kumho Ecstas aren’t the best but they’re very affordable and do the job well. More grip, quieter and better ride than OEM.

Pros: more grip, quieter
Cons: aren’t the best
Vehicle: Mazda 3
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
1 ... 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 ... 135

Write your review

Help others - share your experience with this part.

Other comparisons
Loading...