Tires Falken or Firestone

Falken Tires
Scarlett_stockings
  • Grip:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 4.0

I got a set of Falken Pro G5\u2019s and 20 inch rims when my first set wore out. \nTires and rims were cheaper than a new set of 22\u201d anything. \nNow I can rotate so should get longer life as well.

Pros: cheaper than new set
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Falken Tires

I moved to Falken Wildpeak AT4W 265/70/17’s on my non-lifted 2020 TRD Sport last year. No rubbing whatsoever.

Pros: no rubbing whatsoever
Vehicle: Toyota
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Falken Tires

I have an AWD Volvo with haldex too and just drove it in a snow storm and only slid unintentionally once. I\u2019m also running all seasons that are 3 peak rated(Falken Aklimate) and once again have had no issues in the wet heavy slick snow going both down and uphill and with heavy foot accelerations on flat ground.

Pros: no issues in snow
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Falken Tires
wonko600rr
  • Grip:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 4.0

I put Falken 520's on my Stinger about a year ago and have been happy. They seem to be wearing well (for such a heavy car)

Pros: wearing well
Vehicle: Kia
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Falken Tires
spiceybeanz
  • Grip:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 3.5

My wildpeak AT4Ws look great and offer really good grip on and off road. Bad ass tires. Cons are that they’re really heavy so MPG dropped from 24 to 18 highway, and the ride of the tire is pretty bumpy and uncomfortable, from what I understand it’s bc they are load E rated tires, for heavier full-size trucks so the taco can’t really offer the weight to squish the tire down to a comfortable ride. The MPG dropped was expected and I’m okay with it, but the bumpy ride is a bit disappointing. I would buy load C rated tires next

Pros: great look, good grip
Cons: heavy, dropped MPG, bumpy ride
Vehicle: Toyota
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Firestone Tires
Ok-Response-839
  • Grip:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 1.0

Personally I stay away from the Firestone stuff. Hard compounds that aquaplane easily and still have worse rolling resistance than the premium tyres.

Cons: hard compounds, aquaplane easily, worse rolling resistance
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Falken Tires

we have about 14k miles and they were maintained with rotations at the dealer and will need to be replaced soon. Complete shit tires.

Cons: poor wear, need early replacement
Vehicle: Mazda
Mileage: 14000 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
1 ... 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 ... 125

Write your review

Help others - share your experience with this part.

Other comparisons
Loading...