Tires DUNLOP or Nokia

Nokia Tires
thisiswhoagain
  • Grip:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 5.0

I went Nokian Tyres One, and not from Costco. V-rated, Aramid reinforced sidewalls for pothole damage protection, and low rolling resistance

Pros: pothole damage protection
Cons: low rolling resistance
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Nokia Tires

The Wetproof 1 is a co-agreement with another manufacturer to make the tire to Nokians spec, Nokian are happy with the performance of it

Pros: happy with performance
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Nokia Tires
frbz
  • Grip:
Rating 5.0

I am using them also. They are as good as the Nokian Hakapellitas I had and cheaper too.

Pros: good performance, cheaper price
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
DUNLOP Tires

My wife tried Q4's once - she loved the feel but completely used up a rear in a weekend on a SV650!

Pros: fast warm up
Cons: no life
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Nokia Tires

I am living in Alaska now, where studded tires are a common thing. After five years in Houghton, 3 winters w all-weather tires and 2 with winter tires and now with studded tires, driving a small-to-mid-sized SUV (VW Tiguan and Jeep Renegade), my verdict is that studded tires are overblown. I have the highest end studded tires- the Finnish ones made in Russia. They offer nothing over my all-weather tires. Nothing at all.

Pros: common in Alaska
Cons: overblown, no benefit
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Nokia Tires

I’m getting Nokians. Brand new they were okay in the snow. Not good but okay. After 13k miles and a rotate the first snow was really sketchy.

Pros: okay when brand new
Cons: sketchy after 13k miles
Vehicle: Mazda
Mileage: 13000 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
1 ... 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 ... 109

Write your review

Help others - share your experience with this part.

Other comparisons
Loading...