Tires DEBICA or MRF

MRF Tires

Idk if the showroom guys have control over that because I asked for Apollo and I got MRF. The sales guy told me the bikes get allocated at random.

But coming to the tyre itself I would say the MRFs are good only. Never felt the lack of grip except one time when my tyre was in slushy mud. Appearance wise also the MRF's look a little wider compared to the Apollo's since the tyre profile is more curved in the latter if that matters to you.

Pros: good grip, wider appearance
Cons: lack of grip in mud
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
MRF Tires
wolwologan
  • Grip:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 5.0

Economical and life span, I would recomend mrf wanderer. 6k per tire and will give you 70k+ km life.

Pros: economical, long life
Vehicle: Suzuki
Mileage: 70000 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
MRF Tires

Harder tires like MRF, Ceat, JK etc., will offer good lifetime and low wear and tear.

Pros: good lifetime, low wear
Vehicle: Suzuki
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
MRF Tires

I have these on my Speed 400. I must say they are pretty good. No comparison to any other road tyre MRF has manufactured so far. They are atleast as good as Apollos if not better.

Pros: pretty good, better than MRF
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
MRF Tires

I have beef with MRF, their compound is so hard it makes it seem like I am on roller skates in a wet skating ring when it’s raining.

Cons: hard compound, slippery when wet
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
MRF Tires

Won’t buy MRFs though because they will absolutely get you killed if you push the bike a little bit more than average.

Cons: dangerous at high speed
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
1 2 3 4 5 6 7

Write your review

Help others - share your experience with this part.

Other comparisons
Loading...