Tires DEBICA or MRF

MRF Tires

Bought MRF Mogrip T Tyre for rear. Bikes definitely feels different. Got more confidence in braking now than before.

Pros: more confidence in braking
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
DEBICA Tires

I've been using matador and debica all season tires and debica lasted longer and had better grip in bad weather conditions!

Pros: better grip, longer lasting
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
DEBICA Tires

Eu unul as merge pe Debica Navigator 3. Le detin de aproape de 2 ani si n-am avut probleme.

Pro : distanta de franare este foarte ok pe uscat si chiar foarte buna pe umed as zice.

Pros: foarte buna pe umed
Cons: nu sunt ok pe zapada
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
MRF Tires

Usually should have ideally clocked 40K. But MRF is like that. I changed mine only after 20K after side wall cut and moved to YOKOHAMA Geolander H/T.

Cons: side wall cut
Mileage: 20000 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
MRF Tires

Been using these stock tires for 34k KMs, mostly highway runs, this is my 3rd puncture on these, I never had a single issue on my Amaze tires for 40k KMs, I'm no longer thinking of using it to its fullest and changing it, just want to get a better one ASAP.

Pros: highway runs
Cons: frequent punctures, high road noise
Vehicle: Volkswagen
Mileage: 34000 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
MRF Tires

First don't buy MRF Nylogrip FE. Very thin tyre despite being of the same size. It skids easily with a little lean and you won't be confident.

Cons: skids easily, very thin
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
MRF Tires

Need to replace the front soon, I hate the Zappers the longevity is very good it lasts ages but the grip and breaking is pathetic.

Pros: very good longevity
Cons: pathetic grip, breaking
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
1 2 3 4 5 6 7

Write your review

Help others - share your experience with this part.

Other comparisons
Loading...