Tires Continental or Nokia

Continental Tires

I'll second the continentals. I have them on my car for 2000 miles now and I think they are a great tire, good traction in all conditions. I had 205/50's on my car before and to me, they look too small in the wheel well. Just my opinion.

Pros: good traction, great tire
Cons: look too small
Mileage: 3218 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Continental Tires

I got 205/55/15 Continental ContiExtreme Contact from Tire Rack. I think they were $68/tire. Best all-season performance tire for the price. Great dry,wet, and snow traction.

Pros: Great dry, wet, snow traction
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Nokia Tires

Had my first snow experience with the WRs on my way yo work today. Obviously not the grip of a studded tire, but I think they perform just as good as the Blizzaks.

Pros: perform just as good
Cons: not the grip
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Nokia Tires

I've driven 3 winters with Nokian Q:s. 2.5 with 185/65-14 and 1/2 winter with 195/55-15 and with 15" Q:s handling was much better but grip was same as the 14".

Pros: handling was much better
Cons: grip was same
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Nokia Tires
VeeDubDude
  • Grip:
  • Noise:
Rating 4.5

ditto on the nokias. my last set saw 6 winters (about 30,000 miles) and were still going strong. quiet at crusiing speeds and handle resonably well for snow tires - i'd rather been on my summer rubber for an emergency maneuver, but i've dodged a few deers on the Nokias with no problem.

Pros: quiet at crusiing speeds
Mileage: 48280 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Nokia Tires
Richard Steckly
  • Grip:
  • Noise:
Rating 5.0

I'm a firm believer in Nokians. I have 3 year old 16" Nokian NRWs on my Passat Wagon 1.8T 5 speed, and my wife's Passat Wagon 1.8T Tip is riding on brand new 16" Nokian WRs. With the ESP and the Nokians, my wife's car feels invincible in snow - which is exactly how I want it to be. Both sets are rated for extreme conditions AND provide excellent dry-road performance with minimal noise.

Pros: excellent dry-road performance, minimal noise
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Continental Tires
'03 Tradewind
  • Noise:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 5.0

Precisely the reason why I looked for the Conti's on my quiet, silky smooth ride new car. Until I ride in someone's car with better ones, I'm happy.

Pros: quiet, silky smooth ride
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Continental Tires

my new car, the white love wagon II , came with the conti's but I haven't even begun to break them in, or the engine for that matter with less that 200 mi on the car......but in my first impression the conti's seem quieter that the mxv4 pluses......

Pros: seem quieter
Mileage: 321 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Continental Tires
'03 Tradewind
  • Grip:
  • Noise:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 4.0

Another case of 'ignorance is bliss' perhaps, but I'm favorably impressed with my Conti's (8600 miles since new on 9/11) for quietness, ride, and traction (wet/snow).

Pros: quietness, ride, and traction
Mileage: 13840 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Continental Tires
AlFresco
  • Grip:
  • Noise:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 4.0

I think the Contis get bashed because they look skimpy and performance leans towards comfort and quiet. I have driven 4000 miles in various conditions and can't complain. They've never squealed, skidded, growled or aquaplaned and they give a silky smooth ride.

Pros: silky smooth ride
Cons: look skimpy
Mileage: 6437 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source

Write your review

Help others - share your experience with this part.

Other comparisons
Loading...