Tires BRIDGESTONE or SUNNY

BRIDGESTONE Tires
danny_16v
  • Grip:
  • Noise:
Rating 4.5

Conti DW is a good tire. A bit soft of a sidewall so some vague response. Bridgestone Potenza s04 pole position is better. Better response. Good in wet and good life. Closest to a Michelin Pilot super sport you'll get. Tire Rack rated it a close 2nd if I remember right. I have had both on my M3. I'd get the Bridgestone again, have them now.

Pros: better response, good in wet, good life
Vehicle: BMW
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
BRIDGESTONE Tires
alex_plex
  • Grip:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 4.0

Bought new tires - Bridgestone Potenza RE002 205/50R16. Yeah, it is not stance size, but I'm very bored of driving my static low Corrado with low profile tyres, and would like to enjoy the driving R36 engine without slow down before every pit

Pros: new tires
Cons: not stance size
Part number: RE002
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
SUNNY Tires
jldude84
  • Grip:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 4.0

For what it's worth, I used to run the cheapest 235/40ZR18 tires I could find on my Jetta(Sunny brand if I recall), after a few years, I never had any complaints. Paid about $105 each and they seemed worth the money to me and not much different than the name brands($200+ each), at least as far as durability/safety was concerned

Pros: worth the money
Cons: not high performance
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
BRIDGESTONE Tires

I use Blizzak DMV2 (suv version of the WS80) on my Santa Fe. Unstoppable in deep snow, but that has mattered maybe twice so far this winter. On ice they have been better than my all seasons, but they have not been incredible.

Pros: unstoppable in deep snow
Cons: not incredible on ice
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
BRIDGESTONE Tires

I found the Bridgestone tire to be alittle more forgiving and last longer. The grip on these tires are both amazing and hard to tell them apart on snow and ice.

Pros: amazing grip on snow, ice
Cons: Michelin liner can crack
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
BRIDGESTONE Tires
BUJonathan
  • Grip:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 3.5

I had Ecopias (EDIT: EL-400s) on my Mazda3. They would not die. At like 90k miles I replaced them because they had gotten hard and the snow traction declined... they still had a decent amount of tread left.

Pros: decent amount of tread
Cons: gotten hard, snow traction declined
Vehicle: Mazda 3
Mileage: 144841 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
BRIDGESTONE Tires
Dango330
  • Noise:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 1.0

The factory tires on my 335i are Japanese made Bridgestone RE050 Run-flats. They suck, harsh ride, low tire life, loud, and most of all one small pot-hole and you got an instant sidewall bubble.

Pros: instant sidewall bubble
Cons: harsh ride, low tire life
Vehicle: BMW
Part number: RE050
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
1 ... 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 ... 93

Write your review

Help others - share your experience with this part.

Other comparisons
Loading...