Tires BRIDGESTONE or OEM Volkswagen

OEM Volkswagen Tires

Apart from the stock all-season tires being abysmally horrid in the winter (I have another set of wheels with summer-only tires for warm weather), I haven't had any issues with my car and using the go-pedal.

Pros: no issues using go-pedal
Cons: horrid in the winter
Vehicle: Volkswagen
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
BRIDGESTONE Tires

Normally I'd say to stick with Bridgestone Blizzak, Pirelli Sottozero 3, Michellin X-Ice 3, or Continental WinterContact Si's... But $200 for a slightly used set on wheels that fit your car? Can't really go wrong there.

Pros: can't really go wrong
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
BRIDGESTONE Tires

I second all the Blizzak comments. Ran LM32s on several high power RWD cars with solid traction in the dry and able to get my Mustang and Jag around in snow just fine if it wasnt touching the undercarriage.

Pros: solid traction in dry
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
BRIDGESTONE Tires
danny_16v
  • Grip:
  • Noise:
Rating 4.5

Conti DW is a good tire. A bit soft of a sidewall so some vague response. Bridgestone Potenza s04 pole position is better. Better response. Good in wet and good life. Closest to a Michelin Pilot super sport you'll get. Tire Rack rated it a close 2nd if I remember right. I have had both on my M3. I'd get the Bridgestone again, have them now.

Pros: better response, good in wet, good life
Vehicle: BMW
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
BRIDGESTONE Tires
alex_plex
  • Grip:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 4.0

Bought new tires - Bridgestone Potenza RE002 205/50R16. Yeah, it is not stance size, but I'm very bored of driving my static low Corrado with low profile tyres, and would like to enjoy the driving R36 engine without slow down before every pit

Pros: new tires
Cons: not stance size
Part number: RE002
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
BRIDGESTONE Tires

I use Blizzak DMV2 (suv version of the WS80) on my Santa Fe. Unstoppable in deep snow, but that has mattered maybe twice so far this winter. On ice they have been better than my all seasons, but they have not been incredible.

Pros: unstoppable in deep snow
Cons: not incredible on ice
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
BRIDGESTONE Tires

I found the Bridgestone tire to be alittle more forgiving and last longer. The grip on these tires are both amazing and hard to tell them apart on snow and ice.

Pros: amazing grip on snow, ice
Cons: Michelin liner can crack
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
BRIDGESTONE Tires
BUJonathan
  • Grip:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 3.5

I had Ecopias (EDIT: EL-400s) on my Mazda3. They would not die. At like 90k miles I replaced them because they had gotten hard and the snow traction declined... they still had a decent amount of tread left.

Pros: decent amount of tread
Cons: gotten hard, snow traction declined
Vehicle: Mazda 3
Mileage: 144841 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
BRIDGESTONE Tires
oldracer
  • Grip:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 1.0

I went wit Nitto 555s on the GLIwhich has a much bigger tracttion problem than the R's....huge ride, trn-in and traction improvement. OEM there was the rimprotectors known as Bridgestone RE050As in 225/40/18....horrible crap.

Pros: traction improvement, huge ride
Cons: horrible crap
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
1 ... 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 ... 95

Write your review

Help others - share your experience with this part.

Other comparisons
Loading...