Tires BRIDGESTONE or OEM Porsche

BRIDGESTONE Tires

I'm now on my 3rd winter on Blizzaks because Costco had a deal on them at the time and I thought I'd give them a try. I find them similar, but probably better from the standpoint that I used to be able to spin the X-Ices too easily taking off from a light in slippery conditions, and I can't say that I've noticed that issue as much with the Blizzaks.

Pros: better in slippery conditions
Vehicle: Volkswagen
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
BRIDGESTONE Tires

For price and performance bridgestone blizzak dmv2. Hands down. You will have a different kind of confidence driving in that crap. Its night and day

Pros: different kind of confidence
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
BRIDGESTONE Tires
pezzy669
  • Grip:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 4.0

OEM Bridgestone Alenza tires are known to be trash and the rears were completely done by ~17k miles. I have ~37k miles on the Michelin CrossClimates and the rears probably have another 20k left in them, fronts have another 30-40k left in them.

Pros: Michelin tires last longer
Cons: OEM tires are trash, short lifespan
Vehicle: Volkswagen
Mileage: 54000 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
BRIDGESTONE Tires

I drove from Halifax to vancouver island BC during the first week of Jan 2025, and it wasnt too bad. I have a 2018 ford f250 with 4x4 and bridgestone blizzak snow tires, and it was fine.

Pros: good snow tires
Vehicle: Ford
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
BRIDGESTONE Tires
apadsac
  • Grip:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 4.5

For Illinois daily driving, I\u2019d go with the Bridgestone WeatherPeak out of the three you listed it\u2019s been the most consistent in wet + light-snow grip and rides smoother than the Contis or the BFGs. I swapped to WeatherPeaks earlier this year and they\u2019ve handled Midwest rain and early flurries way better than my old set.

Pros: consistent wet, snow grip
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
BRIDGESTONE Tires

I've had Hakkas, X-Ice and Blizzaks.

Blizzaks seemed to degrade the worst of the bunch and performance fell off faster than the X-ice and hakkas.

Pros: strong in slush
Cons: degrade the worst
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
BRIDGESTONE Tires

Do not get Bridgestone. Mine are down to 5/32 after 20k miles and multiple replacements for leaks with no screws or other foreign bodies

Cons: poor wear, multiple leaks
Mileage: 20000 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
BRIDGESTONE Tires

Am avut până anul trecut Blizzak lm005, am prins temperaturi de +15 grade iar diferențele au fost sesizabile la frânare, aderenta în general, care se rupea mult mai repede fie pe viraje sau accelerare de pe loc.

Cons: poor braking, reduced grip, grip broke faster
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
1 ... 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 ... 93

Write your review

Help others - share your experience with this part.

Other comparisons
Loading...