Tires BFGoodrich or GISLAVED

BFGoodrich Tires

Stock Pirellis were getting a little low after about 35,000 miles and decided to upgrade a bit. Went with KO2s 245/65/17. Love the fitment even more. They’re slightly wider than the stock 225s. Make a huge difference off-road and feels more like a truck when driving.

Pros: huge difference off-road
Cons: wore out pretty quick
Mileage: 35000 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
BFGoodrich Tires

Your KO2s/KO3s are excellent tires, you don't need any other tires for a 3 mile drive. They are 3PMS tires and perform well on ice among AT tires.

Pros: excellent tires, perform well
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
BFGoodrich Tires

K02s aren't the best on wet/slushy pavement in my opinion. I've had the rear step out on me twice cornering, spin in place at a stop a few times and pretty much guaranteed to get a bit loose on standing water with speed.

Pros: phenomenal offroad in snow
Cons: loose on standing water
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
BFGoodrich Tires

I absolutely hate using the KO2's. They're a long lasting tire with a high load rating, but that's because the rubber compound is hard as steel. They're outright dangerous in wet and icy conditions.

Pros: long lasting tire
Cons: dangerous in wet/icy
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
BFGoodrich Tires

Worn KO2s are known to have lots of siping, but for some reason the siping doesn\u2019t go all the way down and they\u2019re known for getting pretty bad in the wet/snow vs some other off road tires.

Pros: lots of siping
Cons: bad in wet/snow
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ... 36

Write your review

Help others - share your experience with this part.

Other comparisons
Loading...