Brake pads WAGNER or OEM Mazda

OEM Mazda Brake pads
LegionVR6
  • Braking:
Rating 4.0

2016.5 CX-5 with 89,000 miles. So far I've had to replace the belt tensioner, accessories belt, water pump belt and breaks (technically I only needed pads and front rotors but I chose to just do them all in one shot since it made a negligible price difference since I was already doing the back pads.

Pros: cheap replacements
Vehicle: Mazda
Mileage: 89000 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
WAGNER Brake pads

My favorite is Wagner OEX pads. They're build on galvanized steel and the friction material is mechanically attached instead of glued on.

Pros: galvanized steel backing, mechanically attached friction material
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
OEM Mazda Brake pads
Kristianf00
  • Braking:
  • Noise:
Rating 4.0

At 55,XXX miles and still haven’t changed my brakes on 2019 AWD Mazda 3(not as heavy as yours but heavier than a FWD 3) Last service, I was in the green for both sets still, but they said I would likely be in “yellow” by 60-65k. I did want to note—I hear no scraping/squealing and brakes feel relatively strong just not as great as new.

Pros: brakes feel strong
Cons: not as great as new
Vehicle: Mazda 3
Mileage: 55000 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
OEM Mazda Brake pads

2015 sedan. I did my brakes last spring. I went with OEM as I found them cheaper than any aftermarket I could find near me and as far as I knew I still had OEM on my car and had lasted me a long time. Zero issues since having them installed, I’m happy.

Pros: zero issues, long lasting
Vehicle: Mazda 3
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
WAGNER Brake pads
HazelnutDVR
  • Braking:
  • Dust:
Rating 4.5

Wagner OEX or Bosch Quietcast

Both are ceramic brake pads that will last longer. Brake fade is experienced in all brakes used excessively but it takes a lot longer in ceramic pads. The only draw back is stopping distance is slightly increase when cold but when warm it's decreased. Bonus is they produce less dust & its very light in color so your wheels look cleaner.

Pros: longer lasting, less dust
Cons: increased cold stopping distance
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
OEM Mazda Brake pads

I was quoted 1200 to change my brake pads on my ND. Did it myself of course but it was funny to find out what the dealership wanted.

Pros: did it myself
Cons: expensive dealership quote
Vehicle: Mazda
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
OEM Mazda Brake pads

My cx9 was at 3mm on the rears at 52k. Get a caliper compression kit and it yourself. It's not very hard. I did my rears a month back in my driveway for $130.

Pros: easy DIY repair
Cons: rear pads worn at 52k
Vehicle: Mazda
Mileage: 52000 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
OEM Mazda Brake pads
marmau
  • Braking:
Rating 2.5

Seems a bit sus - but it's not unusual for rear pads to wear faster than front on certain cars. My Ford Flex and CX-50 both wear pads faster out back (it made sense on the Flex because of long wheelbase but was surprised the 50 did it too). That said they should last twice as long.

Cons: rear pads wear fast
Vehicle: Mazda
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
OEM Mazda Brake pads

The brakes - overheated on several occassions coming down mountain passes. This happened on 2 sets of brakes so it seems like a design issue.

Cons: overheated on mountain passes
Vehicle: Mazda
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
1 ... 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ... 10

Write your review

Help others - share your experience with this part.

Other comparisons
Loading...