Brake pads TRW or OEM Audi

OEM Audi Brake pads

People can talk all they want but I had a 2017 A4 bought at 32k miles and sold with 94k 2.5 years later in 2022 and it was by far the most reliable and hassle free car I ever had. Nothing but routine maintenance, in that period I didn’t even have to change the brakes.

Pros: most reliable, hassle free
Vehicle: Audi A4
Mileage: 32000 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
TRW Brake pads
phulton
  • Braking:
  • Dust:
Rating 4.5

I’ll be switching to TRW Ultra pads when the time comes. All reviews say they are similar in performance to OEM without the dust.

Pros: similar to OEM, low dust
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
TRW Brake pads

I use TRW brake pads (just checked, articles are GDB3592 for front, GDB2172 for back). They make quite a lot of brake dust during spirited driving, but that’s not a big deal for me (IMO more brake dust = less wear on brake discs).

Pros: less disc wear
Cons: lots of brake dust
Vehicle: Mazda 3
Part number: GDB3592, GDB2172
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
TRW Brake pads
_Nihilism
  • Braking:
  • Noise:
  • Dust:
Rating 4.0

I can recommend TRW „DTEC“ pads. Almost no brake dust, no squeaking, good bite on the breaks. The only trade of is that when it’s really cold or raining and you drive on the highway for a long time, the first half of a second when you break again the performance is weak. That’s what I experienced. I never had this with the original pads in winter time or heavy rain.

Pros: no dust, no squeaking
Cons: weak performance in cold/rain
Part number: DTEC
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
OEM Audi Brake pads
rtnlsltn
  • Braking:
  • Dust:
Rating 1.0

As someone who has a TTRS, the brakes blow. Heavy, overheat, poor feel, and expensive rotors/pads.

Cons: heavy, overheat, poor feel
Vehicle: Audi
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

Write your review

Help others - share your experience with this part.

Other comparisons
Loading...