Brake pads OEM Nissan or Hawk Performance

Hawk Performance Brake pads

The OEM pads on my R create more dust than my Hawk HPS pads on my GLI. I’d rather have pads that perform and are kind of dusty. Honestly the dust is easier to clean off than the stock pads so it’s a wash lol.

Pros: perform, easier to clean
Cons: kind of dusty
Vehicle: Volkswagen
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Hawk Performance Brake pads
Audi'sRevenge
  • Braking:
  • Noise:
  • Dust:
Rating 5.0

And yeah the 5.0 is the newer version. As per Hawk: Hawk Performance said: The HPS 5.0 compound is similar in application with a strong focus on improving the already great properties of HPS. This compound offers stronger fade reduction, increased stopping power, easier modulation, and a decrease in wear, noise, and dust. In short, this compound can take more abuse while maintaining great street friendly performance characteristics!

Pros: stronger fade reduction, increased stopping power
Cons: dusting is strong
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
OEM Nissan Brake pads
JHZcar
  • Braking:
Rating 5.0

i have an 80zx with an sbc swap, i’ve rebuilt all 4 brakes, replaced a master, swapped coiled did bushings replaced u joints

Pros: aftermarket solutions
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Hawk Performance Brake pads
midchamp
  • Braking:
  • Noise:
  • Dust:
Rating 5.0

Just replaced my PP pads & rotors. Hawk HPS & EBC RedStuff are both decent ceramic pad options. Shopped around quite a bit and never had the Brembos recommended. I went with Zimmerman blank rotors & Hawk HPS pads. No complaints + expecting less dust!

Pros: less dust, no complaints
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Hawk Performance Brake pads
DEO3
  • Braking:
  • Dust:
Rating 4.0

I was pretty unhappy with the short life span/brake dust of the stock rotors/pads, so when it was time to change them I went with: Centric Cryo-Treated rotors, Hawk HP Street 5.0 pads. I got what I was looking for in terms of improvements to longevity and brake dust, but I'd be lying if I said I didn't miss the bite of the stock setup.

Pros: improved longevity, less brake dust
Cons: missed stock bite
Vehicle: Ford Fiesta
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Hawk Performance Brake pads
ottrocity
  • Braking:
  • Dust:
Rating 4.0

Centric high-carbon rotors and Hawk HP Street 5.0s. Less initial bite than the OEM pads, but more stopping force with higher pedal pressures and much less dust.

Pros: more stopping force, much less dust
Cons: less initial bite
Vehicle: Ford Fiesta
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Hawk Performance Brake pads
ArmenB
  • Braking:
  • Noise:
  • Dust:
Rating 3.5

I used them on the street and in autocross on my '79 RX-7 and would agree that they were noisy and dusty on the street - the dust also ate through the finish on my wheels on that car. I didn't have fade issues with them, but that car was light and not very powerful, so it wasn't very hard on brakes.

Pros: no fade issues
Cons: noisy and dusty
Vehicle: Mazda
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Hawk Performance Brake pads

I'm not happy with HPS 5.0 on my M3- I'm probably going to switch back to "regular" Hawk HPS, as they have worked for me on quite a few cars.

Pros: worked on many cars
Cons: not happy with performance
Vehicle: BMW
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
1 ... 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ... 42

Write your review

Help others - share your experience with this part.

Other comparisons
Loading...