Brake pads Hawk Performance or OEM Mercedes

Hawk Performance Brake pads
ottrocity
  • Braking:
  • Dust:
Rating 4.0

Centric high-carbon rotors and Hawk HP Street 5.0s. Less initial bite than the OEM pads, but more stopping force with higher pedal pressures and much less dust.

Pros: more stopping force, much less dust
Cons: less initial bite
Vehicle: Ford Fiesta
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Hawk Performance Brake pads

For pads I'm having pretty good success with the new Hawk Ceramic 5.0. I run those on my GLI(with Golf R calipers/brakes) and on the .:R. I was surprised for light track duty they were ok on both cars. Not a full on track pad to be clear. They are also a high torque pad so they have really good bite.

Pros: high torque, good bite
Cons: not for full track
Vehicle: Volkswagen
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
OEM Mercedes Brake pads
Heaven7
  • Braking:
Rating 5.0

I consider my W204 C63 visceral, even if not analog. The 6.2 V8 makes all kinds of nasty noises you would not expect from a Mercedes and it howls all the way up to 7200rpm, which may not be that high, but still impresses me given the size of the engine. The car is quick, noisy and has the brakes to back it up.

Pros: quick, noisy, good brakes
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Hawk Performance Brake pads
econsj
  • Braking:
  • Dust:
Rating 4.5

if you are sick and tired of scrubbing your wheels then i would highly recommend ceramic pads as the dust is a fraction of the OEM pads. I just changed out mine a few months ago (hawk ceramic from pelican parts) and the change is night and day. I don't track may car and i would say i'm mildly spirited in my driving, but these have been great so far.

Pros: less dust, night and day change
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Hawk Performance Brake pads
Tylpt
  • Braking:
  • Dust:
Rating 5.0

I had about 21,000 kms on my GLI and noticed a little bit of vibration at higher speed braking. I was sick of the OEM pads dust so I swapped out the pads to Hawk HPS street 5.0's. The front rotors had a ton of wear on it for a relatively new car. I heard from a few shops that the OEM pads eat rotors. I decided to change the front rotors but kept the rears as there was hardly any wear on it. Brake pedal feels much more solid and next to no brake dust and better braking power. Great upgrade and strongly recommend.

Pros: better braking power, less dust
Cons: front rotors wear
Vehicle: Volkswagen
Mileage: 21000 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Hawk Performance Brake pads
cournot
  • Braking:
  • Noise:
  • Dust:
Rating 3.0

They are absolutely not track pads. They fill this awkward in-between in which they have the coefficient of friction and modulation of good aggressive street pads but also dust and make tons of noise in street usage.

Pros: good aggressive street pads
Cons: dust and tons of noise
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Hawk Performance Brake pads

I'm not happy with HPS 5.0 on my M3- I'm probably going to switch back to "regular" Hawk HPS, as they have worked for me on quite a few cars.

Pros: worked on many cars
Cons: not happy with performance
Vehicle: BMW
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
1 ... 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ... 42

Write your review

Help others - share your experience with this part.

Other comparisons
Loading...