Brake pads GALFER or WILWOOD

WILWOOD Brake pads

When I had an NC, I put wilwood pro matrix pads on. I did a few track days a year and then drove it daily in the summer. They held up great, but I wasn't super hard on them at the track.

Pros: held up great, good for daily
Vehicle: Mazda
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
GALFER Brake pads

I just installed Galfer HH sintered pads and they’ve been solid so far. Definitely an improvement from stock but they were getting pretty worn down

Pros: solid performance, improvement from stock
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
WILWOOD Brake pads
TheDeckMan
  • Braking:
Rating 3.0

I have run Wilwoods on my Corrado for years with the usual rebuilding every two years. Even with ABS under full braking using the BP10 pads it would occasionally lock up fully and blow a cogged belt off the supercharger.

Pros: very powerful braking
Cons: requires frequent rebuilding
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
WILWOOD Brake pads

I don't know much about Stop-Tech, however, I have heard from a friend that used Wilwood that these perform best in non-Winter driving conditions. He said that over time they will not stand up as well as a Brembo set up. It might be worth noting what climate (Alaska vs California) that you spend most of your driving time in as well when factoring a BBK upgrade. I also noticed that you are quite new to this group so allow me to introduce you to the member who will derail all original posts into something else to the point where your thread may get locked up. See below. GoGo Golf R said: Ok let's try to agree on the following: 1) Upgrading the brakes is mostly justified for track driving purposes No, Personal preference. 2) Changing the brake pads will reduce dust for street driving Depends on your pad choice 3) Changing the brake pads, rotors and brake lines is pricy Subjective 4) The OEM brakes, while not totally ideal for every driving style, will suffice for average street drivers and some track drivers Depends on your driving style 5) Downshifting with correct rev-matching, will extend the duration and reduce wear on the brakes Yes because replacing your clutch is much cheaper than new pads :screwy:

Pros: perform best in non-winter
Cons: don't stand up as well over time
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
GALFER Brake pads
DerBrizon
  • Braking:
Rating 2.0

I just switched from OEM (Brembo HH Sintered, I think) pads to Galfer HH Sintered pads. I forgot to scotchbrite the discs and I think I glazed everything up during bedding-in process. I used scotchbrite like mad on the discs and sanded the pads with 220 grit until they were dull like when new, but the brakes seem to have the same behavior - heavy brakes test after 10 mile bed-in ride, the brakes plateau without getting to ABS trigger unless I squeeze like a motherfucker. The previous pads I could stand up on the front wheel with one or two fingers, so I feel like I've done something wrong.

Cons: brakes plateau, ABS trigger
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
1 2 3

Write your review

Help others - share your experience with this part.

Other comparisons

Which brake pads to choose — GALFER or WILWOOD?

If choosing brake pads across many manufacturers, check the part ranking. If your choice is down to two brands, the PartReview part comparisons help.

We compare brake pads across these categories:

Comparison of brake pads GALFER and WILWOOD
  1. PR Score.
  2. Overall ranking.
  3. Vote balance.
  4. Average rating.
  5. Number of reviews.
  6. Feature ratings.
  7. Car owners’ choice.

Which brake pads are better — WILWOOD or GALFER?

In March 2026 on PartReview, brake pads WILWOOD and GALFER were roughly equal.

  1. GALFER received a PR Score of 81 out of 100, and WILWOOD scored 78 points.
  2. GALFER ranked 32 in the overall ranking, and WILWOOD ranked 35.
  3. The average rating is higher for GALFER (4.1) than for WILWOOD (4).
  4. Brake pads GALFER have better feature ratings than WILWOOD:
    • Braking - owners believe, that by this property GALFER does not differ from WILWOOD.
    • Dust - drivers claim, that this property for WILWOOD is outperforms GALFER.
    • Noise - reviews suggest, that this property for WILWOOD is preferred to GALFER.

Which brake pads are more popular — GALFER or WILWOOD?

In March 2026 on PartReview, brake pads WILWOOD were overall more popular than GALFER.

By vote balance, brake pads WILWOOD surpassed GALFER:

  • For GALFER, the ratio of positive (27) to negative (6) votes is 21 vote.
  • For WILWOOD, the ratio of positive (33) to negative (9) votes is 24 votes.

By number of reviews, brake pads WILWOOD surpassed GALFER:

Which brake pads do car owners prefer — GALFER or WILWOOD?

In March 2026, according to PartReview, brake pads GALFER and WILWOOD have not taken top places in car-specific ratings. You can help by adding your review about these manufacturers.

Other comparisons of brake pads

If this comparison didn’t fully answer your question, there are many others on PartReview.

For example, comparisons of brake pads GALFER with: EBC, POWER STOP, Akebono, Hawk Performance, Brembo, Ferodo, OEM Volkswagen, Bosch, STOPTECH, Carbotech.

Also available: comparisons of brake pads WILWOOD with: EBC, POWER STOP, Akebono, Hawk Performance, Brembo, Ferodo, OEM Volkswagen, Bosch, STOPTECH, Carbotech.

You can also see who is better among other brake pads manufacturers: EBC or POWER STOP, EBC or Akebono, EBC or Hawk Performance, Brembo or EBC, Akebono or POWER STOP.

Loading...