Brake pads DIXCEL or WILWOOD

WILWOOD Brake pads

When I had an NC, I put wilwood pro matrix pads on. I did a few track days a year and then drove it daily in the summer. They held up great, but I wasn't super hard on them at the track.

Pros: held up great, good for daily
Vehicle: Mazda
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
DIXCEL Brake pads
andrei_jdmshed
  • Braking:
  • Noise:
Rating 4.0

If they’re readily available? Dixcel is for us the perfect blend of track/street usage. Dixcel S, or Dixcel Z if you can live with the little squeak.

Pros: good track/street blend
Cons: slight squeak
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
DIXCEL Brake pads

Dixcel M-Type are the least dusty street pad I've ever used. A little pricey and straight from Japan, but they aren't kidding when they advertise "ultra low dust". Have about 1500 miles on them so far and they're great on the street and for the occasional togue/mountain days.

Pros: ultra low dust, great street
Cons: a little pricey
Vehicle: Honda Civic
Mileage: 2414 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
DIXCEL Brake pads
GasManMatt123
  • Braking:
  • Noise:
  • Dust:
Rating 4.0

Dump the OEM pads. I went Dixcel in my M3 and the thing stops better and there’s so much less dust. Traded off is squeal at higher brake temps.

Pros: stops better, less dust
Cons: squeal at higher temps
Vehicle: BMW
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
DIXCEL Brake pads
Themostepicguru
  • Braking:
  • Noise:
  • Dust:
Rating 4.0

I have always ran DIXCEL Z on all my cars. Extremely quiet once you bed them in and has a temp range of 0-850°C with a friction coefficient of 0.67. They're just a bit dusty.

Pros: quiet, wide temp range
Cons: a bit dusty
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
DIXCEL Brake pads
matadorformissles
  • Braking:
  • Dust:
Rating 2.5

had a track day over the weekend and saw that a hard, black substance that seems a little rubbery had formed on the brakes. The brake pads are Dixcel ES brake pads. I had not bedded them in and instead street drove with it for a couple months as the website suggested. Brake grease was placed on the pad surface contacting caliper. The track has lots of left turns and I braked from 170+ kmh to 80kmh on the first corner. I'm pretty new so i may have braked deep as I was turning. The substance formed heavily on right front wheel, less on left front and none on rear. Brakes were smoking lightly when i came into the pits. Braking feel didn't change throughout the day as I continued lapping. Car still tracked straight. I tried not to brake too hard and didn't observe any other substance buildup.

Cons: brake smoking, substance buildup
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
WILWOOD Brake pads
TheDeckMan
  • Braking:
Rating 3.0

I have run Wilwoods on my Corrado for years with the usual rebuilding every two years. Even with ABS under full braking using the BP10 pads it would occasionally lock up fully and blow a cogged belt off the supercharger.

Pros: very powerful braking
Cons: requires frequent rebuilding
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
DIXCEL Brake pads
TSI50
  • Braking:
Rating 2.0

Tune is pointless for NA in terms of power figures you'll feel the difference a bit but power wise you won't make enough to justify the cost, upgrade the brakes tbh, you get good options from dixcel.

Pros: feel the difference a bit
Cons: power wise not enough
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
1 2 3

Write your review

Help others - share your experience with this part.

Other comparisons

Which brake pads to choose — DIXCEL or WILWOOD?

If choosing brake pads across many manufacturers, check the part ranking. If your choice is down to two brands, the PartReview part comparisons help.

We compare brake pads across these categories:

Comparison of brake pads DIXCEL and WILWOOD
  1. PR Score.
  2. Overall ranking.
  3. Vote balance.
  4. Average rating.
  5. Number of reviews.
  6. Feature ratings.
  7. Car owners’ choice.

Which brake pads are better — WILWOOD or DIXCEL?

In March 2026 on PartReview, brake pads DIXCEL were overall better than WILWOOD.

  1. DIXCEL received a PR Score of 87 out of 100, and WILWOOD scored 78 points.
  2. DIXCEL ranked 30 in the overall ranking, and WILWOOD ranked 35.
  3. The average rating based on reviews is the same for DIXCEL (4) and WILWOOD (4).

Which brake pads are more popular — DIXCEL or WILWOOD?

In March 2026 on PartReview, brake pads WILWOOD were overall more popular than WILWOOD.

By vote balance, brake pads DIXCEL surpassed WILWOOD:

  • For DIXCEL, the ratio of positive (35) to negative (5) votes is 30 votes.
  • For WILWOOD, the ratio of positive (33) to negative (9) votes is 24 votes.

By number of reviews, the manufacturers are equal:

Which brake pads do car owners prefer — DIXCEL or WILWOOD?

In March 2026, according to PartReview, brake pads DIXCEL and WILWOOD have not taken top places in car-specific ratings. You can help by adding your review about these manufacturers.

Other comparisons of brake pads

If this comparison didn’t fully answer your question, there are many others on PartReview.

For example, comparisons of brake pads DIXCEL with: EBC, POWER STOP, Akebono, Hawk Performance, Brembo, Ferodo, OEM Volkswagen, Bosch, STOPTECH, Carbotech.

Also available: comparisons of brake pads WILWOOD with: EBC, POWER STOP, Akebono, Hawk Performance, Brembo, Ferodo, OEM Volkswagen, Bosch, STOPTECH, Carbotech.

You can also see who is better among other brake pads manufacturers: EBC or POWER STOP, EBC or Akebono, EBC or Hawk Performance, Brembo or EBC, Akebono or POWER STOP.

Loading...