Got it
We use cookies to collect statistics and improve your experience. Learn more.
Spare parts reviews ➔ All comparisons ➔ DIXCEL ➔ GALFER

Brake pads DIXCEL or GALFER

Reviews
All
DIXCEL
GALFER
DIXCEL › Brake pads
andrei_jdmshed
  • Braking:
  • Noise:
Rating 4.0

If they’re readily available? Dixcel is for us the perfect blend of track/street usage. Dixcel S, or Dixcel Z if you can live with the little squeak.

Pros: good track/street blend
Cons: slight squeak
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
DIXCEL › Brake pads
Team-Redundancy-Team
  • Dust:
Rating 5.0

Dixcel M-Type are the least dusty street pad I've ever used. A little pricey and straight from Japan, but they aren't kidding when they advertise "ultra low dust". Have about 1500 miles on them so far and they're great on the street and for the occasional togue/mountain days.

Pros: ultra low dust, great street
Cons: a little pricey
Vehicle: Honda Civic
Mileage: 2414 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
DIXCEL › Brake pads
GasManMatt123
  • Braking:
  • Noise:
  • Dust:
Rating 4.0

Dump the OEM pads. I went Dixcel in my M3 and the thing stops better and there’s so much less dust. Traded off is squeal at higher brake temps.

Pros: stops better, less dust
Cons: squeal at higher temps
Vehicle: BMW
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
DIXCEL › Brake pads
Themostepicguru
  • Braking:
  • Noise:
  • Dust:
Rating 4.0

I have always ran DIXCEL Z on all my cars. Extremely quiet once you bed them in and has a temp range of 0-850°C with a friction coefficient of 0.67. They're just a bit dusty.

Pros: quiet, wide temp range
Cons: a bit dusty
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
DIXCEL › Brake pads
matadorformissles
  • Braking:
  • Dust:
Rating 2.5

had a track day over the weekend and saw that a hard, black substance that seems a little rubbery had formed on the brakes. The brake pads are Dixcel ES brake pads. I had not bedded them in and instead street drove with it for a couple months as the website suggested. Brake grease was placed on the pad surface contacting caliper. The track has lots of left turns and I braked from 170+ kmh to 80kmh on the first corner. I'm pretty new so i may have braked deep as I was turning. The substance formed heavily on right front wheel, less on left front and none on rear. Brakes were smoking lightly when i came into the pits. Braking feel didn't change throughout the day as I continued lapping. Car still tracked straight. I tried not to brake too hard and didn't observe any other substance buildup.

Cons: brake smoking, substance buildup
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
DIXCEL › Brake pads
TSI50
  • Braking:
Rating 2.0

Tune is pointless for NA in terms of power figures you'll feel the difference a bit but power wise you won't make enough to justify the cost, upgrade the brakes tbh, you get good options from dixcel.

Pros: feel the difference a bit
Cons: power wise not enough
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
1 2 3

Write your review

Help others - share your experience with this part.

Other comparisons
VS

Brake pads EBC or POWER STOP

VS

Brake pads EBC or Akebono

VS

Brake pads EBC or Hawk Performance

VS

Brake pads Brembo or EBC

VS

Brake pads Akebono or POWER STOP

VS

Brake pads EBC or Ferodo

VS

Brake pads EBC or OEM Volkswagen

VS

Brake pads POWER STOP or Hawk Performance

Show all

Which brake pads to choose — DIXCEL or GALFER?

If choosing brake pads across many manufacturers, check the part ranking. If your choice is down to two brands, the PartReview part comparisons help.

We compare brake pads across these categories:

Comparison of brake pads DIXCEL and GALFER
  1. PR Score.
  2. Overall ranking.
  3. Vote balance.
  4. Average rating.
  5. Number of reviews.
  6. Feature ratings.
  7. Car owners’ choice.

Which brake pads are better — GALFER or DIXCEL?

In March 2026 on PartReview, brake pads DIXCEL were overall better than GALFER.

  1. DIXCEL received a PR Score of 87 out of 100, and GALFER scored 81 point.
  2. DIXCEL ranked 30 in the overall ranking, and GALFER ranked 32.
  3. The average rating is higher for GALFER (4.1) than for DIXCEL (4).
  4. Brake pads GALFER have better feature ratings than DIXCEL:
    • Noise - owners believe, that this property for DIXCEL is better than GALFER.
    • Braking - drivers claim, that this property for DIXCEL is outperforms GALFER.
    • Dust - reviews suggest, that this property for DIXCEL is preferred to GALFER.

Which brake pads are more popular — DIXCEL or GALFER?

In March 2026 on PartReview, brake pads DIXCEL were overall more popular than GALFER.

By vote balance, brake pads DIXCEL surpassed GALFER:

  • For DIXCEL, the ratio of positive (35) to negative (5) votes is 30 votes.
  • For GALFER, the ratio of positive (27) to negative (6) votes is 21 vote.

By number of reviews, brake pads DIXCEL surpassed GALFER:

Which brake pads do car owners prefer — DIXCEL or GALFER?

In March 2026, according to PartReview, brake pads DIXCEL and GALFER have not taken top places in car-specific ratings. You can help by adding your review about these manufacturers.

Other comparisons of brake pads

If this comparison didn’t fully answer your question, there are many others on PartReview.

For example, comparisons of brake pads DIXCEL with: EBC, POWER STOP, Akebono, Hawk Performance, Brembo, Ferodo, OEM Volkswagen, Bosch, STOPTECH, Carbotech.

Also available: comparisons of brake pads GALFER with: EBC, POWER STOP, Akebono, Hawk Performance, Brembo, Ferodo, OEM Volkswagen, Bosch, STOPTECH, Carbotech.

You can also see who is better among other brake pads manufacturers: EBC or POWER STOP, EBC or Akebono, EBC or Hawk Performance, Brembo or EBC, Akebono or POWER STOP.

Loading...
›