Brake pads Carbotech or WAGNER

PartReview Score

Rank #8 in ranking

249

4.2

Braking

4.4

Dust

3.5

Noise

2.3

Owners' choice:

PR Score

Ranking

Votes

Reviews

Average rating

Properties

Car

PartReview Score

Rank #16 in ranking

4.2

Braking

4.1

Dust

4.7

Noise

4.4

No data

Reviews

All

Carbotech

WAGNER

Carbotech › Brake pads

Low-Ad8924 16 Dec 2025, 03:31

Braking:
Noise:

Rating 5.0

I had the same problem with my c8 z51, I switched to the Carbotech 1521 pads and they solved the problem. Would definitely recommend

Pros: solved the problem

Vehicle: Chevrolet Corvette

Part number: 1521

WAGNER › Brake pads

schlidel 5 Dec 2025, 17:03

Braking:

Rating 5.0

I just checked my maintenance notes and for my car I bought brake pads for $18.98 for the front set. They were Wagner OEX closeout and they are still going fine at 30,000 miles.

Pros: still going fine

Mileage: 48280 km

Carbotech › Brake pads

TopTransportation695 28 Nov 2025, 23:50

Braking:
Dust:

Rating 5.0

I had an issue with severe brake dust from the OEM pads on my Z06 Corvette. I replaced the pads with Carbotech 1521s and the dust was eliminated. Made a huge difference with keeping the wheels clean and the pads preformed better.

Pros: dust was eliminated, pads preformed better

Cons: severe brake dust

Vehicle: Chevrolet Corvette

Part number: 1521S

WAGNER › Brake pads

Lazy_Sleep6774 19 Nov 2025, 11:08

Braking:

Rating 4.0

Wagner severe duty pads also have treated me well.

Pros: good performance

WAGNER › Brake pads

windetch 10 Nov 2025, 22:34

Braking:

Rating 5.0

I've had no problem with Wagner, Bosch, Hella/Pagid, and Brembo; Raybestos, Bendix, Beck/Arnley, Centric, etc are all solid options for a daily driver too.

Pros: solid options

Carbotech › Brake pads

heyinternetman 25 Oct 2025, 03:04

Braking:

Rating 5.0

Carbotech has served me very well on my M6

Pros: served very well

Vehicle: BMW

Carbotech › Brake pads

pissjugman 24 Oct 2025, 21:32

Braking:
Dust:

Rating 4.0

I run carbotech 12/10 on my C5. Streetable but messy. I only really drive to track, on track, then home. Probably drive 100 street/leisure miles a year, but after 2 track days on this setup (wilwood aero6 in front) I’m very happy with the setup.

Pros: streetable, very happy

Cons: messy

Vehicle: Chevrolet

Carbotech › Brake pads

Psychedelic_Fart 14 Oct 2025, 17:10

Braking:

Rating 4.0

I'm liking the Carbotech 1521 pads for their better heat tolerance and modulation over OEM pads, though I feel light initial bite is slightly less.

Pros: better heat tolerance, good modulation

Cons: light initial bite

Vehicle: Acura Integra

Part number: 1521

WAGNER › Brake pads

Dry_Nail5901 31 Dec 2025, 01:58

Braking:

Rating 3.0

Oem is expensive and are dealer items, and quality aftermarket brakes are readily available. Look for raybestos or Wagner brands for domestic vehicles, ebc for European vehicles. And there is no need for oem wear parts

Pros: quality aftermarket available

Cons: oem is expensive

WAGNER › Brake pads

ExampleFine449 15 Jan 2026, 00:40

Braking:

Rating 1.0

I had this after replacing mine with shit Wagner pads.

It never improved - had to change them out.

Pros: ebc or powerstop

Cons: shit Wagner pads

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ... 14

Write your review

Help others - share your experience with this part.

Part:

Manufacturer:

Make:

Model:

Generation:

Review tone

Positive Negative Neutral

Reviews found: 0

Voted AGAINST engine oil RAVENOL on the rating page

The brake pads Motorcraft has only 4 reviews. Maybe add one more?

The brake fluid OEM Subaru has only 2 reviews. Maybe add one more?

The brake pads Detroit Axle has only 8 reviews. Maybe add one more?

The brake pads OEM Alfa Romeo got the first review!

The brake caliper OEM BMW got the first review!

The brake pads OEM Infiniti got the first review!

For wiper blades PIAA already 100 reviews.

For battery Energizer already 25 reviews.

In the rating best water pump already 12 brands participate!

In the rating best timing belt already 13 brands participate!

In the rating best head gasket already 3 brands participate!

In the auto rating oil filter for Volkswagen Passat already 5 brands participate!

In the auto rating brake pads for Mazda 5 already 10 brands participate!

In the auto rating tires for Subaru Outback already 50 brands participate!

The glow plug Autolite has only 10 votes! Recommend it?

The fender OEM Volkswagen has only 10 votes! Recommend it?

The brake discs Tesla has only 10 votes! Recommend it?

For cabin filter Fram already 25 reviews.

In the rating best flywheel only 4 brands. Do you know another one?

The brake pads OEM Subaru already has 250 votes!

The engine oil AMSOIL already has 1000 votes!

In the rating best CVT transmission only 4 brands. Do you know another one?

The engine radiator MISHIMOTO already has 300 votes!

Voted AGAINST engine oil RED LINE on the rating page

Voted AGAINST engine oil PENNZOIL on the rating page

Other comparisons

Brake pads EBC or POWER STOP

Brake pads EBC or Akebono

Brake pads EBC or Hawk Performance

Brake pads Brembo or EBC

Brake pads Akebono or POWER STOP

Brake pads EBC or Ferodo

Brake pads EBC or OEM Volkswagen

Brake pads POWER STOP or Hawk Performance

Show all

Which brake pads to choose — Carbotech or WAGNER?

If choosing brake pads across many manufacturers, check the part ranking. If your choice is down to two brands, the PartReview part comparisons help.

We compare brake pads across these categories:

Comparison of brake pads Carbotech and WAGNER

PR Score.
Overall ranking.
Vote balance.
Average rating.
Number of reviews.
Feature ratings.
Car owners’ choice.

Which brake pads are better — WAGNER or Carbotech?

In March 2026 on PartReview, brake pads Carbotech were overall better than WAGNER.

Carbotech received a PR Score of 91 out of 100, and WAGNER scored 87 points.
Carbotech ranked 8 in the overall ranking, and WAGNER ranked 16.
The average rating is higher for WAGNER (4.2) than for WAGNER (4.2).

Which brake pads are more popular — Carbotech or WAGNER?

In March 2026 on PartReview, brake pads Carbotech were overall more popular than WAGNER.

By vote balance, brake pads Carbotech surpassed WAGNER:

For Carbotech, the ratio of positive (274) to negative (25) votes is 249 votes.
For WAGNER, the ratio of positive (95) to negative (14) votes is 81 vote.

By number of reviews, brake pads Carbotech surpassed WAGNER:

For brake pads Carbotech there are 97 reviews: 86 positive, 8 neutral, 3 negative.
For brake pads WAGNER there are 35 reviews: 29 positive, 4 neutral, 2 negative.

Which brake pads do car owners prefer — Carbotech or WAGNER?

In March 2026, according to PartReview, brake pads Carbotech led more car-specific ratings than WAGNER:

Carbotech are chosen by owners of cars such as: BMW M2, Chevrolet Corvette, Honda S2000, and others.

Brake pads WAGNER have not yet taken leading positions in car-specific ratings. You can help by adding a review and specifying your car.

Other comparisons of brake pads

If this comparison didn’t fully answer your question, there are many others on PartReview.

For example, comparisons of brake pads Carbotech with: EBC, POWER STOP, Akebono, Hawk Performance, Brembo, Ferodo, OEM Volkswagen, Bosch, STOPTECH, Mintex.

Also available: comparisons of brake pads WAGNER with: EBC, POWER STOP, Akebono, Hawk Performance, Brembo, Ferodo, OEM Volkswagen, Bosch, STOPTECH, Mintex.

You can also see who is better among other brake pads manufacturers: EBC or POWER STOP, EBC or Akebono, EBC or Hawk Performance, Brembo or EBC, Akebono or POWER STOP.