Got it
We use cookies to collect statistics and improve your experience. Learn more.
Spare parts reviews ➔ All comparisons ➔ Carbotech ➔ DBA

Brake pads Carbotech or DBA

Reviews
All
Carbotech
DBA
Carbotech › Brake pads
TopTransportation695
  • Braking:
  • Dust:
Rating 5.0

I had an issue with severe brake dust from the OEM pads on my Z06 Corvette. I replaced the pads with Carbotech 1521s and the dust was eliminated. Made a huge difference with keeping the wheels clean and the pads preformed better.

Pros: dust was eliminated, pads preformed better
Cons: severe brake dust
Part number: 1521S
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Carbotech › Brake pads
pissjugman
  • Braking:
  • Dust:
Rating 4.0

I run carbotech 12/10 on my C5. Streetable but messy. I only really drive to track, on track, then home. Probably drive 100 street/leisure miles a year, but after 2 track days on this setup (wilwood aero6 in front) I’m very happy with the setup.

Pros: streetable, very happy
Cons: messy
Vehicle: Chevrolet
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Carbotech › Brake pads
Psychedelic_Fart
  • Braking:
Rating 4.0

I'm liking the Carbotech 1521 pads for their better heat tolerance and modulation over OEM pads, though I feel light initial bite is slightly less.

Pros: better heat tolerance, good modulation
Cons: light initial bite
Vehicle: Acura Integra
Part number: 1521
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Carbotech › Brake pads
maxcbrdriver
  • Braking:
  • Dust:
Rating 4.0

Low dust brake pads. On my F87, I use Carbotech 1521. Slight decrease in initial brake bite, significant decrease in dust.

Pros: significant decrease in dust
Cons: slight decrease in bite
Vehicle: BMW
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Carbotech › Brake pads
webdeveloperpr
  • Braking:
Rating 5.0

I track a WRX and have used XP12's in the front and XP10's in the rear. They work very well. IMO Carbotechs are one of the best for the track

Pros: work very well, one of the best
Vehicle: Subaru
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Carbotech › Brake pads
otaner142
  • Braking:
  • Noise:
Rating 3.5

im running XP10s... so far this set up is amazing, the braking is strong initial bite with little fade. Just take in consideration that this Carbotech pads are modular which means you will have a slight longer pedal travel than normal. And yes they are super noisy, when i drive it on the street i try to be careful with my braking and not feather the brakes, that will make then literally screech and grind the rotors, instead i try to brake a bit harder than usual to get a good bite and then let go of the brake once i stoped (put the car in neutral most of the time or creep forward little by little to releave some heat).

Pros: amazing set up, strong initial bite, little fade
Cons: slight longer pedal travel, super noisy on street, screech and grind rotors
Vehicle: Audi S3
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ... 11

Write your review

Help others - share your experience with this part.

Other comparisons
VS

Brake pads EBC or POWER STOP

VS

Brake pads EBC or Akebono

VS

Brake pads EBC or Hawk Performance

VS

Brake pads Brembo or EBC

VS

Brake pads Akebono or POWER STOP

VS

Brake pads EBC or Ferodo

VS

Brake pads EBC or OEM Volkswagen

VS

Brake pads POWER STOP or Hawk Performance

Show all

Which brake pads to choose — Carbotech or DBA?

If choosing brake pads across many manufacturers, check the part ranking. If your choice is down to two brands, the PartReview part comparisons help.

We compare brake pads across these categories:

Comparison of brake pads Carbotech and DBA
  1. PR Score.
  2. Overall ranking.
  3. Vote balance.
  4. Average rating.
  5. Number of reviews.
  6. Feature ratings.
  7. Car owners’ choice.

Which brake pads are better — DBA or Carbotech?

In March 2026 on PartReview, brake pads Carbotech were overall better than DBA.

  1. Carbotech received a PR Score of 91 out of 100, and DBA scored 66 points.
  2. Carbotech ranked 8 in the overall ranking, and DBA ranked 39.
  3. The average rating is higher for Carbotech (4.2) than for DBA (3.7).
  4. Brake pads Carbotech have better feature ratings than DBA:
    • Braking - owners believe, that this property for Carbotech is better than DBA.
    • Dust - drivers claim, that this property for Carbotech is outperforms DBA.
    • Noise - reviews suggest, that this property for Carbotech is preferred to DBA.

Which brake pads are more popular — Carbotech or DBA?

In March 2026 on PartReview, brake pads Carbotech were overall more popular than DBA.

By vote balance, brake pads Carbotech surpassed DBA:

  • For Carbotech, the ratio of positive (274) to negative (25) votes is 249 votes.
  • For DBA, the ratio of positive (24) to negative (12) votes is 12 votes.

By number of reviews, brake pads Carbotech surpassed DBA:

Which brake pads do car owners prefer — Carbotech or DBA?

In March 2026, according to PartReview, brake pads Carbotech led more car-specific ratings than DBA:

Carbotech are chosen by owners of cars such as: BMW M2, Chevrolet Corvette, Honda S2000, and others.

Brake pads DBA have not yet taken leading positions in car-specific ratings. You can help by adding a review and specifying your car.

Other comparisons of brake pads

If this comparison didn’t fully answer your question, there are many others on PartReview.

For example, comparisons of brake pads Carbotech with: EBC, POWER STOP, Akebono, Hawk Performance, Brembo, Ferodo, OEM Volkswagen, Bosch, STOPTECH, Mintex.

Also available: comparisons of brake pads DBA with: EBC, POWER STOP, Akebono, Hawk Performance, Brembo, Ferodo, OEM Volkswagen, Bosch, STOPTECH, Mintex.

You can also see who is better among other brake pads manufacturers: EBC or POWER STOP, EBC or Akebono, EBC or Hawk Performance, Brembo or EBC, Akebono or POWER STOP.

Loading...
›