Brake pads Brembo or Hawk Performance

Hawk Performance Brake pads
aeronutical
  • Braking:
  • Noise:
Rating 4.5

The racing shop that does the work on my track car picked out Hawk HPS 5.0 pads for me for this same purpose. They worked great on the track and don't have much more noise than a factory pad.

I'm only in HPDE2, though, so my track evaluation may not mean much. They were definitely an improvement over the stock pads I used in the previous track outing.

Pros: worked great, little noise
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Brembo Brake pads

Pads and tyres affect braking the most, the actual discs themselves matter much less. Just get some higher tier metallic brake pads and you should be good. I would go for Brembo Extra pads personally.

Pros: good braking performance
Vehicle: Audi A3
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Brembo Brake pads

As for your question, I have Brembo pads on my M6 and 650i and brake dust is minimal in comparison to these. I still scrub my wheels once a month but it\u2019s a way better interval compared to the old ones.

Pros: minimal brake dust
Vehicle: BMW
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Brembo Brake pads
BKGarrison
  • Braking:
  • Noise:
  • Dust:
Rating 4.0

At 50k, my rotors and stock pads were shot. The brembo pads are very aggressive and eat the rotor quickly. If you are racing or spirited stopping often, they will go quick. I went with power stop replacements and I am very happy. No more rotor click and much less brake dust. I daily drive mine, so most of the miles are pretty easy. 2020 spwb charger.

Pros: less brake dust, happy with replacement
Cons: rotors wear quickly, aggressive pads
Mileage: 50000 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Hawk Performance Brake pads
attnSPAN
  • Braking:
  • Dust:
Rating 5.0

Blank rotors and Hawk HPS 5.0 pads. I’ve been running them for almost a decade, and I’m always surprised at how long they last and how little dust they make for how aggressive as they are.

Pros: long lasting, low dust
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Hawk Performance Brake pads
Latitude48
  • Noise:
  • Dust:
Rating 5.0

I haven't investigated ceramic pads for the Golf R but based on the Hawk Ceramic Compound Performance Pads I have on my A4, which has huge RS4 front calipers and B7 S4 rears, I'd try them as they are quiet, generate negligible dust and are easy on the rotors.

Pros: quiet, negligible dust
Cons: none
Vehicle: Audi A4
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Brembo Brake pads
k674511
  • Braking:
Rating 3.0

To save you money, they probably did not need to change right rear caliper if only your left one was seized. They also could’ve given you options for prices on brakes and rotors as it appears they quoted you for dealer quality brake pads.

Pros: options for prices
Cons: dealer quality expensive
Mileage: 146000 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Brembo Brake pads
WestonP
  • Braking:
Rating 3.0

I'm running a Trueno, which has the factory Brembos. With the stock pads at a track with a decent amount of braking demand (at which I've had more severe brake issues in several other cars), I get about half way into a session before they start to fade... not bad, but enough to notice reduced performance (firm pedal, just longer braking zones). There's no doubt that running an actual track pad that's meant for the heat will completely resolve the issue.

Cons: brake fade, reduced performance
Vehicle: Toyota
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Brembo Brake pads

Brembos are street pads, they are designed to be low noise and low dust. They’re not for any sort of aggressive driving.

Pros: low noise, low dust
Cons: not for aggressive driving
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
1 ... 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 ... 64

Write your review

Help others - share your experience with this part.

Other comparisons
Loading...