Brake pads Akebono or OEM Mercedes

OEM Mercedes Brake pads
Ryukein
  • Braking:
Rating 5.0

In prepping the car for sale they spend $10,000 on \"all 100k maintenance items and known chronic problems,\" including brake pads and rotors

Pros: brake pads replaced
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Akebono Brake pads

My preference is either OEM, or Brembo rotors and Akebono pads. I have had good performance on multiple cars with the Akebono ProACT ceramic pads.

Pros: good performance
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Akebono Brake pads

I kept hearing good things about Akebono. Had been using random brands for years. I switched to Akebono and was blown away how much less brake dust is on my rims!

Pros: less brake dust
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Akebono Brake pads
TomMikeson
  • Braking:
  • Dust:
Rating 2.5

I'm in the "Akebono are not better" camp and I have done some extensive testing.For a ceramic pad, yes, the Akebono are better than ceramic competitors. However, they do not have as much bite as the semi-metallic pads. This is something that can't be debated, they can't bite as hard as the semi-metallic compound.I too hate brake dust and tried the Akebono pads on my wife's VW and I immediately noticed that they didn't bite as hard as the OE pads. That same week, I ordered the OE pads and it fixed the problem.I've also tried the Akebono on an E350 and I came to the same conclusion. I actually think the EBC Red ceramics may bite a little more (when new) than the Akebono. However, the EBC reds always left this weird deposit on rotors that would make it feel like they were warped and they would need to be turned down.

Cons: less bite than semi-metallic
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Akebono Brake pads
sloaxy
  • Braking:
Rating 1.0

About a year ago I bought some Akebono ceramic brake pads for my 2016 and they have given me nothing but grief, notably the fronts whose retainer clips just straight up didn't fit into my caliper so I needed to reuse the stock ones and I also had to grind down the pad ears to fit properly. The fronts were particularly bad (part no. ACT1539).

Cons: poor fitment, needed grinding
Part number: ACT1539
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
1 ... 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ... 46

Write your review

Help others - share your experience with this part.

Other comparisons
Loading...