Tires YOKOHAMA or Kumho

YOKOHAMA Tires

I'm on my 3rd season on mine with about 60 runs and the same 60 second course a season and I just put in my best performance last month.

Pros: long lasting, best performance
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
YOKOHAMA Tires

Yoks are fast asf. Between the yoks and my new years resolution of "don't be a bitch" I picked up something like 2 seconds over last year.

Here's how my tires look after this season. This is \~75-80 runs total on a 60s course on concrete. There's still meat on the bone, but I don't think there's another 80 left. I'll be buying more tires by the middle of next season at the latest.

Pros: fast, improved performance
Cons: wear quickly
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
YOKOHAMA Tires

I just purchased new Yokohama @ $230 each. I didn't notice a difference in sound and still getting the same 3.2 kwh as OEM Dunlops. With 11/32 depth, my Ariya handles better with the Yokohamas.

Pros: improved handling
Vehicle: Nissan
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Kumho Tires

Kumho u ranngu premiuma na suhom i mokrom a malo losije na snijegu a jeftinije

Pros: premium na suhom i mokrom, jeftinije
Cons: losije na snijegu
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Kumho Tires

Also 215/55er gibt's von Kumho auch schon für unter 100€ das Stück, da würde ich jetzt nicht zu einem Fabrikat greifen, das im ADAC nicht über "mangelhaft" rauskommt.

Pros: affordable price
Cons: mangelhaft ADAC rating
Vehicle: Mercedes
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Kumho Tires

Some Kumho winter tires or someshit. Had them almost a decade ago and only went 1 winter on them before I said fuck it and bought Michelins.

Cons: not specified
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
1 ... 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ... 96

Write your review

Help others - share your experience with this part.

Other comparisons
Loading...