Tires YOKOHAMA or KENDA

KENDA Tires

I bought Kenda vezda’s becuase they were the cheapest 200 tread wear tire out there. They have been awesome, especially for the money.

Pros: awesome for the money
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
YOKOHAMA Tires
RMPAR
  • Grip:
  • Noise:
Rating 4.0

Las Yokohama son un un sueño en cuanto a andar, en pavimento mojado son un caño y muy silenciosas, pero se gastan rápido, las Bridgestone originales me duraron como 75k, y las tomo a los 50 las tuve que cambiar.

Pros: muy silenciosas, andar un sueño
Cons: se gastan rápido
Mileage: 50000 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
YOKOHAMA Tires
Royal-Incident2116
  • Grip:
  • Noise:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 5.0

Le puse Yokohama Geolanadar recién a la V6. El día y la noche con las Pirelli Scorpion que traía, que eran una piedra. Las Yoko son súper suaves y silenciosas y tienen tremendo agarre.

Pros: súper suaves, silenciosas, tremendo agarre
Cons: van a durar menos
Vehicle: Volkswagen Amarok
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
KENDA Tires

If you're okay losing by a big margin but are focused on self-improvement, try running Kenda Vezda KR20a's (make sure it's the 200tw version). They are dirt cheap and stupid durable.

Pros: dirt cheap, durable
Cons: losing by big margin
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
KENDA Tires

I've had them on my Tacoma for about 20-25k miles and they've gotten really bad on wet pavement lately. 90% of my driving is on pavement and these things are becoming a liability after it rains.

Cons: bad on wet pavement
Mileage: 22500 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
YOKOHAMA Tires

Yokohama A-drive: horrível, no seco vai muito bem... na chuva vira sabão, pneu perigoso.

Pros: bom no seco
Cons: perigoso na chuva
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
1 ... 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 ... 68

Write your review

Help others - share your experience with this part.

Other comparisons
Loading...