Tires YOKOHAMA or Firestone

YOKOHAMA Tires
topherdrives
  • Grip:
  • Noise:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 5.0

I would seriously consider the Yokohama Geolandar x-cv. I replaced the crap falkens around 31k miles, have about 22k on the yokos and they are fantastic. They also still look and drive new, probably will get 50-60k out of them. They ride very smooth

Pros: ride very smooth, look new
Vehicle: Mazda
Mileage: 31000 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
YOKOHAMA Tires

I have the Yoko geolandar g018 on my 22' in MT. I just switched to my winter studs for the ice on BZN pass, but otherwise the Yokohamas were doing great in the snow.

Pros: doing great in snow
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Firestone Tires
Southpontiac
  • Grip:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 4.0

I\u2019ve had decent luck with the all weather Firestone Destination At/2 and I had some nokians before that that were really good but treads wore a bit faster.

Pros: decent luck, really good
Cons: treads wore a bit faster
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
YOKOHAMA Tires
Puiu1
  • Noise:
Rating 4.0

I'm running yoko geolander A/Ts at the moment, the side walls are much stiffer than the last tires I was running which were BF Goodrich vantage controls, which imo were solid all season tires. The geos don't make much road noise and have performed very well in the snow.

Pros: performed very well in snow, don't make much road noise
Cons: stiffer side walls
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Firestone Tires

I’ve had both the firestones and pilot sports on my corvette. The wet weather grip on the PS is much better. I would fishtail pretty regularly with the firestones. Would not recommend if you plan to drive in the rain.

Cons: poor wet grip, fishtail regularly
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
1 ... 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 ... 86

Write your review

Help others - share your experience with this part.

Other comparisons
Loading...