Tires RIKEN or IRONMAN

RIKEN Tires
thegoldenleaves
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 5.0

Recently bought some Rikens(Japanese tyre company that is now owned by Michelin and made in EU) for my wife's car and they are smooth AF.

Pros: smooth AF
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
IRONMAN Tires

I got the ironman iMove gen 2 as, for about 600 CAD plus instal they are a all season and have been really good so far, just terrible in snow and ice other then that I'd recommend

Pros: good all season
Cons: terrible in snow, ice
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
RIKEN Tires

Rikens are fine. They're quite a soft tyre, probably because like you said Michelin make them butbthat does meant the grip is decent.

Pros: decent grip, soft tyre
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
IRONMAN Tires
d_em
  • Grip:
Rating 4.0

I’ve seen a lot of people in WA run Ironmans. Decent grip and decent thread wear. Solid tire for the money.

Pros: decent grip, decent wear
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
RIKEN Tires
MK7_JSW
  • Grip:
  • Noise:
Rating 4.5

Speaking of cheap tires, I recently switched my tired old 41k mile Sumitomo ZIII with these $43 in 225/45 17 Riken raptor ZR and quite surprised how well they are. They grip as good as my ZIII did, way quieter and rain performance was fantastic. I was hesitant at first until I read reviews on tirerack phrasing these are great tires and they are definitely good. I also learned Riken is part of the Michelin tires company so its probably of decent build quality.

Pros: grip as good, way quieter
Mileage: 65982 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
RIKEN Tires

They have an aggressive tread pattern and I have driven them for the last 7 months in a variety of conditions from downpouring rain to hot, humid sun and they have not let me down yet. I push them hard on a cloverleaf on-ramps. They grip well and don't even chirp.

Pros: grip well, very responsive
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
RIKEN Tires
fbobberts
  • Grip:
  • Noise:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 4.0

Have these on the 944 and they are surprisingly good. Not pirelli p7 good, but good and they hold up. Honestly I have no issues with them. (Riken Raptor ZR summers)

Pros: surprisingly good, hold up well
Vehicle: Porsche
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
IRONMAN Tires

I use 245-45-17 but ironman gen 2s have slightly less grip, and will last about as long. Only big downside I noticed is off throttle the ironmans will "float" alot more than the 595s. I started running the ironmans when the federals started going out of stock everywhere this summer

Pros: last about as long
Cons: less grip, float more
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
RIKEN Tires
turnoffable
  • Grip:
  • Noise:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 3.5

We used to use the P Zero Nero as they came on our mustang but they just didn't have the traction we wanted...We replaced them with RIKEN RIKEN RAPTOR ZR tires @ about $100 each (raw tire)

The Riken handle better on blacktop, although it's no super sticky tire but the front end doesn't plow near as bad.

Pros: handle better on blacktop
Cons: no super sticky tire
Mileage: 30000 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
RIKEN Tires

I’ve been running Riken Raptor ZR A/S tires since I got my WRX just over a year ago and FINALLY got my hands on a set of Blizzaks. I’m excited to see how they handle any future snows here in Colorado Springs. We just had a good bit of snow dumped on us this past week and the all seasons were definitely showing signs of needing replacement.

Cons: needing replacement
Vehicle: Subaru
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
1 2 3 4

Write your review

Help others - share your experience with this part.

Other comparisons
Loading...